Calif. Regulators Temporarily Block Assault Weapon Rules

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California regulators announced Tuesday that they have temporarily blocked proposed new rules on assault weapons.

The state’s Office of Administrative Law released a two-paragraph notice, without explanation, rejecting the proposed regulations submitted by the state Department of Justice in May.

Spokesmen for Attorney General Xavier Becerra, who runs the department, did not return multiple requests for comment. Gun-owners’ rights groups said the proposed regulations would include too many firearms in the state’s assault weapons definition.

Lawmakers passed a bill last year to outlaw new rifles that include devices known as “bullet buttons,” which help gun users rapidly reload. The buttons let shooters quickly remove ammunition magazines using the tip of a bullet or other small tool, and were developed by manufacturers to get around a California ban on new rifles with magazines that can be detached without the aid of tools.

The law lets residents keep weapons they already own with bullet buttons, rifles that are often referred to as being “California compliant,” but requires that they register them.

Gov. Jerry Brown on Tuesday signed a bill extending the deadline for assault weapons owners to register their weapons by six months, from Jan. 1 to July 1, 2018. The justice department is writing regulations around what weapons and attachments are included and how gun owners would register their weapons, among other things. Those regulations must be approved by July 1, 2018, in order for registrations to begin.

Chuck Michel, attorney for the National Rifle Association and its affiliated California Rifle & Pistol Association, said Becerra’s office inappropriately used a limited exemption in the assault weapons law to avoid public comment on the new regulations.

The Legislature allowed justice officials a limited exemption from the usual public comment for procedural regulations such as how gun owners would register their weapons, what forms would be needed and what fees would be charged.

But opponents say officials used that limited authority to avoid public hearings altogether on the substance of the regulations, such as what weapons or attachments would be covered.

Those proposed rules then were drawn too broadly and would classify too many firearms as assault weapons, opponents argued. Michel’s group counted more than 40 new assault weapons definitions.

“It seems like they’re trying to stretch the law to cover a lot of guns that shouldn’t be deemed to be assault weapons under the law,” Michel said.

Justice officials previously submitted similar proposed assault weapons regulations to the Office of Administrative Law in December but withdrew them in February. Michel said Becerra could appeal this week’s rejection by state regulators to Gov. Jerry Brown.

Brown signed six total bills last year to stiffen gun laws that are already among the strictest in the nation following high-profile mass shootings.

Judges in Sacramento and San Diego counties are considering whether to delay a law that goes into effect July 1 that requires gun owners to give up magazines holding more than 10 bullets. Another law would impose restrictions on buying ammunition starting next year.

(© Copyright 2017 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

Comments

One Comment

  1. Alex Leslie says:

    “Bans new rifles with magazines that can be removed without the aid of tools” (excuse my paraphrase, I’m on a mobile device and copying multiple segments is prohibitive)

    No, the new law mandates that stock rifles must be modified to be compliant. The “rapidly reloadable” rifles now included in the legislation are rifles where a finger is insufficient to actuate the magazine release and the user must go through the extra step of changing the magazine by making use of a pointed tool or bullet tip.

    Legislators do not care about the safety or damage capability of weapons, or they would not ban arbitrary features in order to subversively ban a few scarier looking rifles. Just look at the other banned items named by Hollywood excited legislators with a few too many ninja and spy movies under their belts: shuriken (ninja throwing stars), nunchaku, blowguns, kunai, sword canes, etc. suppressors, a safety device to reduce or eliminate the need for additional hearing protection, are mandated in some countries, but the unrealistic portrayal of their use by silent assassins in film is the only excuse needed for our state to ban them outright much the same, the vast majority of prohibited features named in state law are ergonomic at best, and important safety features at worst.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

More From CBS Los Angeles

facebook.com/CBSLA
Plan Your Trip
Follow Us On Twitter

Watch & Listen LIVE