No Oxnard Parents Show Up To Protest Teacher’s Alleged Hardcore Porn Career

OXNARD (CBS) — Parents were invited to a school board meeting Wednesday evening to express their concerns after an Oxnard middle school teacher was placed on paid leave for allegedly dabbling in hardcore pornography.

However, not one parent with a student at Haydock Intermediate School attended, according to CBS2’s Suraya Fadel.

The school board confirms parents were invited to the regularly scheduled meeting, but acknowledges that no extra effort was made to let them know they could address the situation.

“It was very unfortunate that we learned from both students and staff at Haydock Intermediate School that a teacher at the school may have participated in a pornographic video,” Oxnard School District Superintendent Jeff Chancer said at Wednesday’s meeting.

Victor Manriquez, who has an 11-year-old daughter, says he felt morally obligated to show up. Manriquez told Fadel in Spanish that he was disappointed in parents who failed to attend the meeting and appear to be uninterested in the scandal that’s unfolding at Haydock.

Officials say the 30-year-old science teacher, who is not facing any criminal charges, will remain unidentified to protect her privacy.

Teachers and staffers from other Oxnard schools have been instructed not to talk to reporters about the scandal.

Comments

One Comment

  1. qdrone says:

    This teacher needs to get a lawyer and sue the schoolboard. What she is doing is not illegal but if she was paid and never declared it then she has a problem with the IRS.
    What she does in her own time is her business,the school board has business telling her what she can and can’t do to earn money.

    1. Andrew says:

      AND that is one of many reasons the education system needs to be replaced , not fixed , there”s been enough time and money wasted trying to fix it , and its completely broken , beyond repair broken . And it IS the parents business . !

      1. jim says:

        Yes it is the parents business. The parents that allowed the minors to view the porn should be thrown in jail for child neglect and child endangerment. Then the children should be awarded to the state

      2. badwhisky says:

        The education of our children needs to be the business of the local comunities we live in not the federal government. Parents need to become commited to raising responsible adults and should be involved in the lives of their children, that is what is broken.

      3. paul heart says:

        need to go check all teachers , theres even ones working no credentials , illegal mexicans etc .

      4. Paco Jerte says:

        Paul Heart you are a moron. The issue is a teacher committing an “immoral” act, not her ethnicity or legal status. It appears that you never went to school based on your poor grammar and lack of knowledge. Teachers must pass a background check before permitted to be around children. You big dummy.

    2. Vince says:

      Yeah I’m guessing you are one of those sex hating Santorum supporters. This isn’t any of your business, get the hell out of people’s sex lives you perv.

    3. Tsar Bomba says:

      She did it in her own time, so it’s none of your business. I doubt she’s teaching porn to kids in science class, so what’s your real issue w/ this situation?

    4. Macfad says:

      You know, I’m pretty sick and tired of the measuring stick to gauge all moral and ethical behavior being the legality of the act. The law does not determine morality. Whether or not it was legal is irrelevant – she has lost all moral credibility. I’d love to see what kind of respect and control she will have over those kids when she pretends her past won’t come back to haunt her. …..( “Ok, class let’s discuss the Pythagorean theory…if a equals the length of the hypotenuse..and b equals the length of…..” Jr. High Johnny “Uh ,excuse me teach, what’s the length of the biggest **** you ever sucked off? Class erupts into juvenile laughter.)

      1. k says:

        I recall someone saying he who is without sin should cast the first stone. I also recall he hung around with an ex prostitute.

      2. LA_SUX says:

        Why would the students show respect when the teach doesn’t respect herself. You’re kidding yourself if you think something like this wouldn’t distract you from learning at that age.

      3. Jacob says:

        Wow, Its just porn. Don’t we remember how we became parents? if we keep telling kids that sex is bad and shameful, we are gonna ruin our species. Sex is great, in fact its probably one of the best things in life. People, please stop brain washing your children.

      4. FSM_47 says:

        Tiffany Six is the young woman;s ‘stage’ name. Came out in an earlier article.

    5. IrvTheLiquidator says:

      I saw the porn in question.. it took place several years ago. I don’t think this should still be an issue. It was obviously something this person did in order to pay her way through school. Besides she was very good at it…

    6. TommyB. says:

      Tsar Bomba ,
      My issue is that public school kids clearly deserve better teachers than a woman who’s other job involves getting shamelessly gangb*nged on film. This is hardly the sort of person who should be shaping young minds, and despite some misguided people who feel that this is a resume enhancer, this woman is emblematic of the low standards people have grown accustomed to when dealing with government schools.

    7. Morris says:

      The only problem is that they don’t have a morality clause in the contract. It is her business and her time. If that is how she wants to get her kicks, fine. So long as she does not bring it into the class room why should it matter.

      1. August says:

        Who says being a porn actress is immoral; it’s a legal business that pays a lot of taxes & provides jobs…..

        Have you EVER seen a porn?

      2. Darrel says:

        Apparently you watch them a LOT.

    8. oscar says:

      fortunately, morality clauses only cover your actions while you are employed, NOT things you did years before they hired you. The district was not within their rights to fire her UNLESS she made the porn while she was employed by the district.

    9. Fredddie says:

      i disagree.
      I would not want that nasty broad to serve me a drink much less teach my kids.

      1. craig says:

        Says the guy with the biggest porn stash…….lol

    10. baysiders says:

      Care to post a copy of that contract, Morris? If its a public school, I bet there is one. And as for you, Oscar, I highly doubt you’re a lawyer, so your legal opinion of contract law is just that, an opinion – not fact. Thanks for pretending to be an authority on contract law.

    11. MartyB says:

      She serves at the pleasure of the school district according to established rules of conduct not to mention an ethical and moral standard by which all teachers are measured. Only a nincompoop would defend this woman…oh, sorry, didn’t mean to offend…on second thought, yes, yes I did mean to offend, nincompoop.

      1. jim says:

        Well we should also jail the kids parents for child neglect and child endangerment, since the parents broke federal allow and allowed the minors to view porn, then since no adult is in the house the kids should become ward of the state.

    12. no says:

      STFU. I don’t want to educate your stupid children on my dime, *period*. Pay for your own spawn’s education.

    13. vance says:

      it’s been reported in the news that there is no morality clause in her contract. and even if there were- it wouldn’t apply to the video that was made when she was a student, not a teacher.. And she probably has less student loan debt than the prudes.

    14. Eric says:

      She was never in the race, but thanks for playing.

    15. Wendy Bisset says:

      Her time, her business, 110%. People in this country need to get over the fact that humans are sexual creatures and stop worrying about what they do outside of their employment. If she was a factory-worker would people be so upset? There is zero accusation of her doing anything inappropriate in the execution of her work. Teachers should not have to live like ascetics.

    16. JLanceCombs says:

      Don’t care about the porn teacher, myself. But, I agree with TommyB says, that what taxes pay for are the business of the tax payer. This is not a “stick your nose into people’s sex lives” issue. This is a “what is my money paying for?” issue.

    17. Jim in Houston says:

      Typical of a morally bankrupt libaturd!

      1. Mark in Houston says:

        What’s wrong with these people in California? Please, all of you stay in California. I’m not trying to change any of you, I just don’t want you infected the rest of us.

      2. AJ says:

        Mark in Houston, give me a break. Teachers having relationships with students happens all over the country–including one accused in HOUSTON a few weeks ago (28 years old raping an 8th grader).

        That is WAY worse than what this teacher in CA did, and I don’t see people saying “please stay in Houston as to not infect the rest of us.”

      3. Giggity-goo says:

        Morally bankrupt? The difference between most libs and conservatives is liberals admit to enjoying sex, porn, weed, booze, whatever. Conservatives condemn these things in public and just do it in private.

    18. LetsGetReal says:

      What a dumb story. So much of the news is made up after the coup and cover up. Unelected officials took over Washington and the media. They think you can’t handle the truth. Fact of the matter is we have no democracy, president, and freedom of press is an illusion.

      Our next election is shaping up to be as big of a sham as the last. Do you know why Sarah Palin’s bus tour was really canceled? Do you know why she stayed 30 miles away from the second debate and chose the death of Steve Jobs to announce that she’s not running? Know what leaked out? Sarah Palin and Cain aren’t in the race for the same reason, the truth leaked out. Search PalinsDirtyLittleSecret for the biggest cover up in history

    19. mugsy says:

      the parents have the morality issue, i feel sorry for the kids, the parents didn’t care enough to even attend a meeting on the matter, so sad for the children.

    20. Republicrat says:

      Your parents had sex. Shocking huh?

    21. Keebler says:

      TommyB…… There are doctors in this world whom have bad drug additctions. You have teachers that are sleeping with school children and on drugs. What this woman did for money has nothing to do with her abilities to teach. She may very well be a very educated person and smarter than you. Do you teach your kids anything worth of value? You may want to think real hard about that before you answer because best I can tell, you are an idiot.

    22. Hugh Jass says:

      Maybe if the state stopped cutting teaching jobs and lowering the wages of our teachers, then they wouldn’t have to get second jobs.

    23. mini meme says:

      The headline says that no parents showed up for the meeting, but then, there is a paragraph towards the end of the article that mentions…

      “Victor Manriquez, who has an 11-year-old daughter, says he felt morally obligated to show up. Manriquez told Fadel in Spanish that he was disappointed in parents who failed to attend the meeting and appear to be uninterested in the scandal that’s unfolding at Haydock.”

      So did this parent show up at the meeting? Was he the only one? Why is this parent speaking Spanish and not English? Why does this parent feel morally obligated to show up at a school board meeting regarding the private, legal activities of the teacher in question?

      also…
      How were students able to discover pornagraphic videos of this teacher? Did they view them at home, or did they view the porn at school? Who is responsible for allowing minors access to porn? The parents? The school? The internet provider? The municipality? The state? Are any of the aforementioned entities being questioned or held accountable for their culpability in all this? Is it a crime for minors to view porn? Should minors who view porn be removed from their home? removed from the school? arrested? Is it a crime for a parent, school system, teacher or internet provider to allow minors to access porn?

      As you can see, there are a lot of UNANSWERED QUESTIONS HERE😉

    24. GoldenRudy says:

      So, I guess if this teacher was an officer holder or just regularly attended meetings of a white supremacist group, on her own time, you would not have a problem with her remaining a public school teacher? Really?

    25. carnut says:

      Agreed.
      Most school districts have a morality clause as part of the teacher contract to prevent this kind of problem. It sounds like a school district in California does not. shock of all shockers.

      I have problem with her doing porn if thats what she wants to, but if it was part of her contract , then thats another issue.

    26. joe says:

      Anyone who has sex or had sex while not being married, shouldn’t be living in this society or even on earth, yes?

    27. Southern Man says:

      My God! Miramonte School just had to replace an ENTIRE staff because of a lack of MORAL fiber! When children are involved, the school board, and PARENTS have every right(and obligation) to have their noses in the business of people who are responsible for the children.

    28. John says:

      Mimi – This is what it said: “not one parent with a student at Haydock Intermediate School attended” The article then says that Mr. Martinez has an 11-year old daughter, NOT that she attends that school.

    29. badwhisky says:

      If our tax dollars were not paying for the porn and there were no laws broken then she should be left alone.

      I hear Bobby Gentry singing Hopper Valley PTA in the background for some reason.

    30. sexism morality says:

      If porn is a problem, we must ban it! but unfortunately it is accepted that human trafficking in condemning the victims of this system, there will always be women raped, abused, who fall in forfeiture or other

    31. sexism morality says:

      people who have been advertising in this case are the dogs, if this woman has no right to forget, it risks losing more than his job! each pig who masturbated in front of a porn n ‘is not allowed to judge. Even Jesus chose as a former prostitute girlfriend, Madeleine, he said “the first who has not sin cast the first stone”

      1. blackcurry says:

        Her name was Mary Magdelene and she repented of her sins.

  2. bob says:

    I think she dabbled in adult video well before she became a teacher. now if this had been a guy in adult video I bet the reaction would have been different

    1. Macfad says:

      In a morals clause, it doesn’t matter “when”. It refers to all past, present and future behavior while employed in the vocation of an educator.

      1. Bob says:

        There is no morals clause in California teachers (and most others) contracts.

  3. Chuey says:

    I wish we had teachers like this when I was in school….ya know why there were no parents to protest? CAUSE NOBODY CARES!!!!!!!

  4. jim says:

    i wonder what rush would say

    1. Barry says:

      Don’t know about Rush, but Bill Maher thinks we should just leave the stupid c**t alone.

    2. Griefman says:

      “nice tah tahs”

    3. Martha says:

      “escapades”

    4. Martha says:

      Rush would say thank you for not forcing the rest of us to pay for her sexual escapadess .. (one can be libertine – as is Rush – and still be against demanding other people support our pleasures and habits).

      1. MartyB says:

        How do you know he’s a libertine? Is it part of your daily fantasy fare? I’ll bet you’re Martha the Miilf of webcam fame. Were you a teacher too?

  5. carlos says:

    i know who the teacher is and i saw her videos. pretty lady. it’s unfortunate.

    1. Martha says:

      Unfortunate in what way?

  6. John Doe says:

    A five minute search online will tell you who she is. I know who she is.

  7. bob says:

    it is los angeles after all ..cesspool of the west.

    1. Reverend Justito says:

      Actually it’s Oxnard, which is located north of Los Angeles in Republican friendly Ventura County. Perhaps you should do some homework before you leave uneducated comments on news articles.

      1. MartyB says:

        Yes, you’re right, he should have said, “It’s California after all…cesspool of the west.” That would have been more accurate.

    2. dan says:

      next thing is no plastic surgery? in Cali?

  8. James says:

    Its nobody’s business. Would be a different story if she was sexually harrasing the students. lol…and I agree where was this type of teacher when I was in school. http://www.savethemoon.net

    1. baysiders says:

      Never heard of a Morality Clause in a contract? The school is well within their rights.

      1. Shelley says:

        I consider it immoral that people ratted her out.

      2. baysiders says:

        I consider it immoral that you think its immoral for people to rat her out.

      3. recursion says:

        I consider it immoral that you think it’s immoral that she think’s it’s immoral for people to rat this educator out.

      4. jim says:

        @ baysiders It’s immoral that the parents of the children watching the porn which is illegal for a minor to view are not in jail for child neglect and child endangerment!

    2. THE ARBITER says:

      ANOTHER IDIOT HEARD FROM.

  9. TommyB. says:

    This gross porno degenerate is exactly the kind of low caliber people that government public schools employ. Its amazing to me that so many of you people continue to send your own children off to these public school dungeons. Take some responsibility for your family!

    1. AnnoyedAtTrolls says:

      Degenerate? You’re a grown man and go by “Tommy.” Go Trololol somewhere else. Public schools are hardly dungeons.

      1. TommyB. says:

        Nonsense, public schools are absolutely filthy and filled with low class union teachers who moonlight in pornos among other disgraces. The government public schools have been a continual failure since inception and none of your replies will change the facts.

    2. dan says:

      I was SHOCKED when I realized 90% of PRIVATE teachers are trying and WANT to get in the public school system. I was paying alot of money to send my kids to private school, then found out their teachers are the ones who cannot or have not gotten in the public schools yet. ( a little LOWER of a caliber usually), THEN.. I found out my kids were going to school with kids that were getting VOUCHERS and generally, the kind we hope our kids do not hang with. It is unfortunate, but they were welfare kids, like I say UNFORTUNATE, but not always the BEST kids, if you wanna lump em all together.. don’t be so QUICK, to get on your high horse…….

      1. OnTheWhip says:

        Umm, I call BS. Is this your personal poll? Or maybe it’s a Soros poll? MSNBC?

      2. Know it all says:

        I would really love to see the data that you used to formulate your analysis.

        I will be SHOCKED to learn that you made these stats up in your head?

    3. JoeyJoeJo says:

      Hey Tommy, remember when those wicked and evil public school teachers crashed the stock market, wiped out 60+% of every 401K in the US, secured 100’s of billions in risky home loans that defaulted, took over $1 trillion in taxpayer-funded bailouts, caused the worst oil spill in the history of the continental United States, gave themselves billions in bonuses, and paid absolutely no taxes?

      Yeah……. me neither……. I must be thinking of other people….. never mind.

      1. MorganGray says:

        Oh, yes, you mean Obama’s Democrat donors?
        The ones who gave money to Barry, and Barney Frank, and Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi? Those bankers?

        You really need to stop watching network news, there Joey.

    4. Tommy's right hand says:

      She had sex, moron, just like the rest of us. You too even. That is if you spent time away from message boards. And you’ve Google-ed her already too. So preach on, moral citizen. Doing a bang up job so far. Jesus loves you.

      1. OnTheWhip says:

        Ummm, most of the “rest of us” don’t post it online our encounters. But since you’re so proud, what’s your screen name so we can watch you?

      2. MorganGray says:

        Right, she had sex, just like the rest of us.

        Except…

        The rest of us didn’t get paid to have sex (gee… I think there is a term for that)
        The rest of us didn’t allow someone to film it.
        The rest of us didn’t allow that person to post it to the internet.
        The rest of us aren’t public school teachers.

        She made a bad decision. She is paying for it now. She should accept her punishment and not go whining to the press about it, or crawling to the courts to sue the district.

        She was an adult when she got paid to have sex on camera (still… there is a term for that). She knew what she was doing. She got caught. She paid the price.
        End of story.

      3. patson says:

        I don’t think most of us have had sex for money on camera.

  10. Lenny says:

    You got to be kidding me, he News is so negativley slanted its scary. So what she does porn, I bet she can still teach kids about science. Also Her name has already been released. This news channel needs to fire their producers.

  11. SheilaJ says:

    I’m not sure what the story is about. Seems like they blame the lack of participation on uninformed parents. But I think parents realize this is a non issue. Funny how she must have been able to earn more money as a teacher..haha

  12. Binky says:

    Just don’t give her the bum’s rush!

  13. Curmudgeon10 says:

    Enough of bizzaro world, please. She appears on the internet in sex acts, but her name is withheld to protect her “privacy?” Doesn’t everyone in that school know her name? You morons need a better explanation than “privacy.”

  14. johnnyb says:

    You mean to tell me that the only one that showed up was a parent that didnt even speak english? L.A is the worst place on earth!

    1. RT says:

      It’s not LA, it is just being reported by CBS-LA.

  15. Michael McSpick says:

    I would have to see the evidence to make any kind of an educated comment, especially at a school board meeting.

  16. jay says:

    I’m surprised parents, and readers didn’t show up in support of the teacher. The article says her name is withheld, yet there are other sources where you can find this information.. and when you do and google it, you’ll see that students were well aware of her “ex porn star” status as far back as 2009..

  17. Jonathan says:

    What simply happened to start all this is I’m sure an authority in the school or educational system of that area tried to take advantage of this woman for her past, and when she turned them down they got her fired over this. That’s most likely what happened.

  18. Michael Feldman says:

    school board in california out of touch with real parents, now who ever could have expected that?

  19. JD says:

    all the dads in the district destroyed the notices..

  20. hillcoguy says:

    If it was on the net, she or the man she was “seeing” in the video (he had a very penetrating stare), put it there and BOTH probably approved. She shoudln’t feel down in the mouth about it, her male counter part had a nice pizza surprise for her, obviously, he gave hump!

  21. Morey Ladini says:

    No matter, there’s no way she could maintain a classroom or command respect in her present school. Especially a MIDDLE school where the snickers, rumors and hormones run wild.

    BTW: judging from the video thumbnails I googled…she seems pretty racist…well, reverse-racist anyway.

    1. dennis says:

      how can taking pix of yourself naked can be racist?

  22. Darrel says:

    My first comment of the day, and I get “you are posting too quickly slow down” and my post disappears into the ozone. What a dysfunctional system!

  23. dennis says:

    I went to Catholic school with nuns. No pix like this when I was in school.

  24. hmmm says:

    I’m confused, the article’s title is “No oxnards parents show up to proest teachers…” Yet the article identitifies a parent who showed up.

  25. Darrel says:

    Half the women in the world are banging someone for return compensation. Dinners out, movies, trips, a roof over the head, a man to pay the bills. Your moral outrage over women having sex for return in compensation is ridiculous.

    1. joe says:

      Again the lib doesn’t get the point. Please if you can’t comprehend the story, go back to watching 2 and a half men. No one is outraged over women having sex, you must be a product of the public school system.

  26. jackal says:

    She’s more qualified to be a teacher than obama is president

  27. Martha says:

    Sounds like Harper Valley PTA!

  28. FedUpWithStupid says:

    People are terminated or denied jobs every day by employers who find out about there online antics. Why should this situation be any different? Don’t put it online if you don’t want to deal with the potential outcome. You are free to do as you please on your own time but if your boss finds out about it you may just lose your job, really pretty simple.

  29. JustAGuy says:

    Two questions:

    1) Why are the administrators not alarmed their middle school students were surfing porn?
    2) Why is Victor Manriquez talking to the reporter in Spanish? Is he an illegal alien?

  30. Paul says:

    I’ve seen her and she seems like a nice person, actually with a reserved personality. In all sincerity I would have no worry about having her teach my child science in junior high. Let’s all be kind. To her students I say, “Do you like her as a teacher? Do YOU want her to go on? If so she’s going to need your support. Here’s where YOU get to make a difference. Give her your emotional support when she comes back.” (FYI, I’m a 60 yr old man, former high school French teacher in New England.)

    1. Martha says:

      Great advice!

    2. Pearson says:

      Looks like her poor choices have caught up with this woman. Actions still have consequences. Teachers are a dime a dozen. Fire her and move on.

  31. josetoyou says:

    This is a reflection of the low moral values of the community, and of California in general. It is a good place to be from….

  32. mamawati says:

    Probably should have discussed the state’s pandering to illegals and a lot of people would have come.

  33. tomfromalgonquin says:

    Most likely will improve fathers attendance at parent teacher conferences.

  34. larry says:

    NO mention of the parents who let their middle schoolers watch enough porn to find their own teacher?

  35. Eric says:

    If it’s in her contract, that she signed, that “moral turpitude” is an offense for which she can be fired, then she’s fired.

    If not, and her behavior was legal, then she can’t be fired.

    Why do people make these things sound so complicated?

    Personally, I wouldn’t tolerate a porn star teaching my kid. I’d seek other options. But that’s just me.

  36. Vinnie says:

    This chick is pretty hot, I wish I had teachers like her when I was in school

  37. k says:

    I recall someone saying he who is without sin should cast the first stone. I also recall he hung around with an ex prostitute.

    Of course the real irony is the only person that showed up was an illegal…. and no one seems to have a problem with that.

  38. Mark Twain says:

    This is not the fault of the teacher nor the fault of Oxnard Schools. It is George Bush’s fault.

  39. tax_revolt says:

    TommyB; How is she shaping young kids minds, when she teaches a subject that is rooted in facts based on observable evidence? There should be nothing else being taught or expressed in that classroom.

  40. Jim in Houston says:

    It’s no wonder they call that disaster of a state Californicate! You people are really sick.

    1. Mark in Houston says:

      It’s consistent with the liberal aversion to consequences. They abhor the thought of being faced with the negative consequences of their actions. Obama: Doesn’t want his daughters “punished” with a baby – of course not, people should be able to freely have sex and if they end up creating a baby …. well, that’s just not fair. If they don’t want to study in school, well it’s just not fair that they can’t get a job earning what Romney earns. They are human viruses which require a host body to live off of. What a bunch of children.

  41. eramrthgin says:

    Shocked shocked I say. Come on this is California why is everyone got themselves in knots over this? In California it should not be a big deal. Think about it the land of drugs, sex, make believe and porn why should this even be an issue. The fact no parents showed up demonstates that now one cares about it. If she is a “good” teacher then keep her. Don’t hear anyone complaining about the students, parents and educators that watched that evil porn. It will not be long before “main stream” movies start having explicit sex scenes in a few more years.

  42. uisignorant says:

    Anyone else concerned it was Middle School kids that found her porn first?

  43. allness says:

    Finally! Here is real evidence that the “stimulus” package actually worked.

  44. JustSaying says:

    Her problem more than likely is that she lied about her past “jobs” when she applied. Most states require public educators to list any morally questionable acts or jobs they did prior to being hired. Background checks are not that deep, so they rely on the applicant to be truthful. Yes, the teacher probably has a decent case to win good severence package. However, school districts also have the right to know of thier employees pose a legal risk. The school district’s insurance company I’m sure demands this. This teacher’s past behavior makes her a risk.

  45. WALTC says:

    So the stuedents and staff were looking at porn, no consequences. Teacher makes a porn years ago, suspended.

  46. jeff says:

    The kid that found her porn on the web is probably upset she wouldn’t do him and he ratted on her.

  47. mz says:

    Dang, I didn’t watch porn till I was in high school, now middle school kids are watching porn. What’s going on?

  48. WALTC says:

    Since when do California politicians know anything about moral perpitude?

  49. gern blanston says:

    …and yet NO one brings up the FACT that the school kids are watching PORN! Equal scorn should be heaped on the PARENTS! Oh, and I liked the ‘comment’ from the one parent who attended, was in SPANISH! He couldn’t even speak English!

    While I’m deeply disturbed by a teacher doing hardcore on the side, the accusers aren’t perfect either! *sigh* …only in California… *shakes head*

  50. Tommy says:

    Gawd, who cares. It is not like she is doing anything bad with kids. She is doing it anymore. She is not teaching a morality class.

  51. maxtor says:

    you actually think anyone would show up?? this is so funny!! who is watching what?? nobody wants to admit to watching her!! LOL

    it is on her time and no kids are involved unless the parents are letting the kids watch porn in which i am sure there are a lot that do let their kids watch the stuff. but to admit by showing up is not going to work.

  52. Brian says:

    She did nothing wrong.
    We need to stop ruining peoples lives over petty irrelevant things such as this.

  53. August says:

    The county schools sure have no problem taxing those porn star’s paychecks to pay for their own paychecks & build the schools!

  54. Rhonda says:

    I would sue the hell out of that school board.

  55. Rhonda says:

    The school board needs to stay out of employees’ bedrooms.

  56. LMM says:

    This is why her students will eventually be speaking Chinese to their bosses. You think they would care about her off the job “morality?” All that should matter is whether she is the best teacher to prepare them to compete.

  57. Rufus says:

    “Victor Manriquez, who has an 11-year-old daughter, says he felt morally obligated to show up. Manriquez told Fadel in Spanish that he was disappointed in parents who failed to attend the meeting”

    This is AMERICA. Speak ENGLISH in this nation you Mexican immigrant. I’m so SICK of people pushing THEIR nationality in THIS nation. GO BACK TO WHERE YOU CAME FROM IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO ASSIMILATE!!!!!!!!!!!!

  58. walter12 says:

    It is LA, what do you expect? As long as you are a good leftist, you can do anything and be anything you like. Your day is coming though, riots, Mexican invasion, turmoil, anarchy, the Big One, floods, fire, and on and on.

  59. Fred says:

    I’m not as worried about what a teacher does on her own free time as I am about schools in California being required now to teach a curriculum about gay and transgendered folks to kids in elementary school. But, since they’re both totally legal in the state, I guess I’m amazed that they’re after her on this. And, she’ll sue them at some point, collect millions and be paid for life and never have to set foot in a classroom again. I call that outrage being misdirected…

  60. Jerry says:

    The parents don’t want to have to explain how their children are watching porn.

  61. Darrel says:

    The real obscenity is in the White House.

  62. Calsewer says:

    The Parents are watching the porn with the kids. You can tell from the amoral freaks commenting that they are unhappy she got caught. The more perverted you are the better admired you are in California. The hated people are the Bible believing Christians that have a moral base. NO problem. The Lord will turn them all into hell. The judgment coming on this Nation will be something to behold. Sick em God.

  63. ydkm says:

    How can some folks comment that “their children deserve better than a teacher with a history of porn” when your children are freely browsing porn on the Internet in the first place?! Sounds like a double standard to me. So they can browse porn just as long as it’s not porn that includes their teacher right? As soon as they find porn with their teacher in it then the problem of your kid browsing porn easily becomes the teachers problem. As long as the porn is with people that your kids don’t know then it’s all OK right?

    The problem is that most folks are too inept or lazy (and probably both) to figure out how to prevent your children from browsing porn. You just cop out with an excuse like “it’s no worse than looking at a Playboy” (keep telling yourself that) or “they’d just do it over their friends house.” I’ll help you with the excuse you should use here, just tell yourself, “if it wasn’t their teacher in the porn they were looking at it would just be someone else in the video.” There, that was easy.

    Now I’m not in favor of censoring the Internet but parents have to have some common sense and personal responsibility here. Is it OK for your middle schooler to drink beer? Do drugs? Handle your loaded guns? The Internet is just as dangerous (stalkers, porn, hackers, etc) so you might try to keep the bad stuff out of your kids hands before you point the finger at someone else as being the problem.

  64. PMT says:

    The parents did not show up for two reasons: they are not involved in their children’s lives and
    if they did show up, the school distict would do what it wants to anyway, the district doesn’t care what parents want.

  65. rwolfram says:

    I think the current driving the anti-sexual expression movement among social conservatives likely has nothing to do with ‘morality,’ but rather shame. They despise sex because they aren’t very good at it😉

  66. websurfer says:

    The teacher goes by the name Tiffany Six. It’s all over the web

  67. Agrippa says:

    Well this is where we are now. Citizens who are in love with their own moral degeneracy are defending a prostitute who is socializing their children, because they themselves like pornography. You people are not defending her you are defending your own behaviors.

    When I was in 8th grade we had a teacher who was in Playboy. It got out and soon her centerfold was posted on the bulletin board. She was gorgeous but that created an atmosphere where she couldn’t teach. Do you think I was listening to her talk about history after seeing the centerfold? Do you think any other child was either? The answer is NO.

    The real problem is we have a country full of losers who cant get laid and so they patronize pornography for self gratification. They are the weak and we should never cater to the weak. If it was not for the huge amount of weak and cowardly males there would be a small porn industry and it would still be illegal. Porn makes billions every year from losers who have to date their hands, and women are not usually atracted to beta males of that type.

    This teacher would have never been drawn into this poisonous industry if American men were not a bunch of ja**offs in the first place. That is the plain ugly truth. On the bright side I have my choice of females because there is so little competition out there for good looking alpha males.

    We will lose the next world war folks because we are weak. Pornography is just a symptom of the underlying disease. America has terminal cancer.

  68. stu finnes says:

    “No Oxnard Parents Show Up To Protest Teacher’s Alleged Hardcore Porn Career”
    Hell no they didn’t, they were all home spankin’ to her vids,
    She IS hot.

  69. URPathetic says:

    Some school children still approach their teachers for advice on a variety of subjects. Let’s hope this porn skank/teacher isn’t drawing on her past experiences as a paid wh0re while dishing out advice to impressionable youngsters. Or, maybe I have it wrong and perhaps she’s uniquely qualified to teach horrified kids about STDs.

  70. liuxiang says:

    Check out the video if you can. She has a pretty killer bod. Great rack, nice butt. All the people complaining about this are either bible-thumpers or ugly women.

  71. anon says:

    Those of you making unnecessary comments about this person, please remember she is someone’s daughter, granddaughter, sister, and niece. There are people who love and care about her, regardless of the choices she made in the PAST. Please try to show some tact and maturity, or just refrain from saying anything at all.

  72. Patryk says:

    “Officials say the 30-year-old science teacher, who is not facing any criminal charges, will remain unidentified to protect her privacy.”

    She does porn! It doesn’t seem as though “privacy” is one of her bigger concerns in life.

    That being said, it’s not illegal. But this might conflict with her job. I could see students not taking her seriously after seeing the jumbo sausage. I’m just saying — middle school boys are pretty rough. Changing schools might be a good idea.

  73. Paul says:

    By now almost everyone has viewed sexual entertainment–old, young, men, women, professionals, illiterates, ministers, priests, nuns, even (for emotional & social therapy) the aged. Unless our technology is swept away by an Armageddon it will remain a part of modern life. It and sports and entertainment-news draw the attention of large populations away from civics and politics. So it will continue to be smiled upon pragmatically by Washington, Moscow, and Beijing. Were moving toward a new adjustment of sexual behavior in our lives that will take at least twenty years.
    Nowadays so many adults, married couples, and even other teachers already use the resources of sexual entertainment–mutual video taping, photos, sex hardware & apparel, and internet videos for pre-sexual stimulation–in their day-to-day lives.
    In my opinion that was the big reason why no parents showed up–none of us now can or should point the accusing finger at someone else.

  74. Middle Finger says:

    its not that big of a deal…no one cares

  75. sexism morality says:

    the real problem is that these are parents who let their children watch porn! everyone does what he wants with her body and if we went back to your room, I think many people would judge you harshly.

    If a video as a private sextape was put on the internet, what difference would it make? The children could see their teacher to have sex because everyone makes love each and can be trapped.

    Personally, if we were dealing with the sexual morality of teachers, I think those followers specialties “teen” are more dangerous.

    Each year, many teenage girls sleep with adults who were abused by the psychological descent. Shame and ignorance have been abused protect these men.

    This woman has a choice of life, if you deprive yourself of the work, you will be responsible for his downfall. She may have had a problem explaining this error prejudicial to person, but what excuses to consumers of porn responsible for human trafficking?

  76. glove of love says:

    Rich people don’t have to care, and can hold to convenient opinions about politics ‘n junk, b/c they can afford to live away from the social problems. Poor people won’t care b/c they don’t have standards. Only a place with a thriving middle/upper middle class would show a contingency that cares whether their kids grow up prurient or not.

  77. RT says:

    So, what. As long as the Teacher is not doing them anymore, it’s OK with me. Come back with a story when a Teacher is caught doing hard core porn when still employed by a school.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

More From CBS Los Angeles

KNX 1070 Newsradio
Play.It

Listen Live