LOS ANGELES (CBS) — A woman who says she was raped by a man she met on Match.com wants the online dating site to stop accepting new members until a sexual-predator screening system is installed.

KNX 1070’s Ed Mertz Reports

Lawyers for television/film producer Carole Markin, of Hollywood, filed a request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction in Los Angeles Superior Court last month to speed Match.com’s promised implementation of sexual predator screening.

Match.com then had the hearing moved to federal court in Los Angeles.

Markin’s attorney, Mark L. Webb, says he has subpoenaed his client and her alleged assailant, Alan Paul Wurtzel, as well as Match.com president Mandy Ginsberg to testify at Monday’s hearing before U.S. District Judge Stephen V. Wilson.

“The issue of sex offender screening has never before been presented to a court,” Webb said. “Because Match.com moved this case to federal court, we now have the extraordinary opportunity of obtaining a federal guideline by which to measure sex offender screening in online dating services.”

Officials at Match.com said the company would begin cross-referencing members against the National Sex Offender Registry, a process which Webb contends could take months to implement.

Markin says she met Wurtzel on Match.com in 2010, and that, after they went out twice, he raped her in her apartment.

Afterward, the woman checked up on Wurtzel, and found out he had previous sexual battery convictions, according to Webb.

Wurtzel has been charged and is awaiting trial. His attorney, Sharon Morris, says that Wurtzel and Markin had a “consensual encounter.”

Markin, who was initially identified in court papers as “Jane Doe,” said she went public with a series of media appearances because, “I want to prevent something like this happening to another woman.”

(©2011 CBS Local Media, a division of CBS Radio Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Wire services contributed to this report.)

Comments (18)
  1. krg says:

    She could have checked up on him BEFORE she went out with him. HOw about instead of wasting the courts time she do something about educating people on how to date safely? This is NOT Match’s responsibility and it’s time people in this country start taking some SELF responsibility for their actions.

  2. nots says:

    Totally agree 100% with (krg). Nobody told her to go online to find a man. It’s her fault for doing such a stupid thing. Take responsibility for YOUR actions. I bet if she found a millionaire at match.com she would’nt of have gone to say “thank you match.com, here take this money”.

  3. BFS says:

    Two dates and he’s in her apartment? If she didn’t consent then it was wrong no matter what. However you don’t let someone you met online, dating site or not in your apartment that quickly.

  4. sam says:

    Why was he in her apartment on the SECOND date?….idiot

  5. Crystal says:

    The only problem i see is that 50% of sexual predators/pedifiles go unknown because the people are to scared to report them. Therefore they are NOT going to be in the books. You just have to be extremely carefully and use your senses,

  6. Karen says:

    I am so over it. She went out with him TWICE – 2 TIMES – and brought HIM to HER APT. Then accuses him AFTER she looks up some public info? What is her problem? Notice how the article mentions she’s a producer. She obviously needs work and is going for the attention angle.

  7. Joshua says:

    It amazes me that regardless of her lack of judgment you are all so quick to judge her and most of you are women. That is just plain sad. We live in a world where the victim is no longer a victim. So if she would have waited a month and then invited him in , then it would be ok right? You all make me sick. Women can be raped at anytime in any place and I would hate to have you all on the jury panel because the defendant would walk free only to go and kill someone later. Just a shame.

    1. swhitS says:

      No, he would not go free. Her stupidity does not warrant getting raped however, blaming Match.com for HER lack of action of not checking him out is not warranted.

      I checked out Match and on the front page it states:
      Online Dating Safety tips
      Dating Articles and Advice
      I didn’t read because I am not interested in giving any info to the site but I am willing to bet they have a disclaimer.

    2. crystal says:

      your absolutly right… it doesnt matter if you know a person for a really long time, they can always turn on you. its not this ladies fault, i wasnt judging her, i would never judge someone. but it is really upsetting seeing most of these people put this lady down like it was her fault.

  8. Johndoe says:

    She should try yahoo personals this time. Lol!

  9. Anthonyd Smith says:

    Don’t worry. He won’t need Match.com in prison. Or a date for that matter. what goes around comes around.

  10. mister s says:

    This is ridiculous. You can’t hold the website responsible. If she had met the guy at a club would she be suing them? If match.com starts requiring identity verification and then background checks, their business will be finished, prospective users don’t want that hassle.

    1. diosdado1001 says:

      I agree wth you. match.com should not responsible. As you said, i a woman meets a guy at church, nightclub, on the bus, or anywhere, then she starts dating this guy and turns out to rape her, she cannot sue the place where she met him. She seems to be a professional and she should have allowed more time before she invited him in. Normal people usually wait longer to take someone into their apt.

  11. Figures says:

    MySpace allows known predators, who even post inmate numbers, to open account online to find women.

    I turned one such account in to the DA. It was reported to Myspace to be against the TOS.

    Did they take it down?


    They don’t want enemies.

    These companies DO need to be held accountable.

  12. Lillith says:

    As Match.com is a dating website and not your run of the mill social networking site, I’m surprised this hasn’t come up before. I feel they have a responsibility to prescreen members beforehand and sexual predators should not be allowed to join. It does not matter the number of dates this woman went on. Online dating should be a better, safer way of meeting someone than in a bar-that’s the whole idea right? Screening should be a part of the deal.

  13. Sleeper says:

    Has everyone forgotten that these sexual predators are not only of the male portion of society?
    If your going to check men then guess what you need to check woman also as you did get your equal rights under the law your not immune from the same scrutiny and or protection of society hell you fought for it. Equal protection under the law period end of story. This is not a woman bashing deal either I love my wife so step off!!

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

More From CBS Los Angeles

Weather Team
Goldstein Tipline

Watch & Listen LIVE