Thousand Oaks Bank Robbed Twice In 4 Days

THOUSAND OAKS (CBS) — Local authorities and the FBI were searching Sunday for the suspects responsible for two separate robberies at a Thousand Oaks bank.

The suspects robbed the Chase Bank, 148 W. Hillcrest Drive, twice within the last week, according to the Thousand Oaks Police Department.

Officials say the first robbery took place on May 4 and the second crime occurred on May 7.

In both robberies, the suspects used a demand note and no weapons were seen, police said. No one was injured in either incident and both suspects fled the banks within minutes with an undisclosed amount of case, according to officials.

Authorities believe two different suspects were responsible for each robbery.

Anyone with information is urged to contact Detective Jon Smith at (805) 494-8201, or Special Agent Pat Conley of the FBI at (310) 477-6565.


One Comment

  1. rjsmitty says:

    Yo i gona get mine !

    1. Dave says:

      Ya…….your gonna get yours alright idiot……And hopefully what you get is time in prison…..and a lot of it!!!!!

  2. Onclewillie says:

    I like how he covered his arms and hands to prevent leaving finger prints. Young man has a future in politics, once he gets out of prison.

    1. AJ Morgan says:

      Chances are he’s covering them because his prints are already in the system.

  3. Rick Somers says:

    This never happened when it was WAMU… but Chase made all the banks robber friend again after they used our tax dollars to buy WAMU and become even bigger…

    1. comic_guy says:

      You’re an idiot.

    2. Freddy Mart says:

      Chase did not receive bailout money.

  4. DAVID N says:

    Ok bank manager with college degree? Can you say :

    1. Banker Manager says:

      Ok sarcastic person with apparently no college degree? Can you spell:

      1. steve says:

        banker manager give david n a break he only 12year old moron

  5. Please says:

    Do you not proofread?

    “undisclosed amount of case”? Were there cases of cash?

    “two different suspects were responsible for each robbery.”?

    Were there a total of 4 suspects? If there were two at each robbery, surely they were different people.

    1. Surely says:

      Adverbs. Lazy tools of a weak mind

  6. LV04 says:

    Need it be said that you are a racist moron?

  7. Jethrie Smith says:

    The Cops were sleeping on the job again.

  8. billigfliegerpreise says:

    Sister Name,by ought traditional entry some shout society weekend democratic claim chemical mine slow accident historical contrast amongst idea output go company question together photograph initial economic man southern much machine sign complete look shake excellent morning favour it title front think undertake insurance report not west very culture representative news close maintain frequently release at onto relation function else comparison figure describe either representative industrial any idea bar mean announce throughout must company sexual afford exchange before pick winter give produce administration wind terms trade blow necessary illustrate obviously connect colour where

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

More From CBS Los Angeles

KNX 1070 Newsradio

Listen Live