LOS ANGELES (AP) — The struggling Los Angeles Times found a local savior in a biotech billionaire willing to buy the storied newspaper from a corporation half a continent away, but the change of ownership brings its own set of questions and uncertainty.

Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong agreed to pay $500 million and assume $90 million in pension liabilities for the Times and San Diego Union-Tribune, Tronc Inc. announced Wednesday.

The news was met with a mix of optimism and skepticism by those who have seen the newspaper plagued by cutbacks and circulation declines and roiled by leadership changes in the two decades since it was sold to Tribune Co. by the Chandler family.

“Some people might think this could be the white knight, the savior, but nobody knows that,” said Steve Davis, a journalism professor at Syracuse University. “All they know is that it’s a change, that it’s somebody new who says the right things.”

Soon-Shiong, who was one of several local tycoons who have discussed throwing a lifeline to the Times in recent years, said in a statement that he looked forward to carrying on the “great tradition of award-winning journalism” at both papers. Representatives didn’t return messages seeking an interview with him.

Soon-Shiong amassed his fortune in part by developing a cancer drug in 1991. He was already a major shareholder in Tronc, one of the richest men in Los Angeles and the nation’s wealthiest doctor by Forbes’ estimate, with a net worth estimated at $7.8 billion.

The sale reflects a trend of billionaires buying up newspapers, most notably when Amazon founder Jeff Bezos bought The Washington Post in 2013 for $250 million, in a move that has reinvigorated that newspaper and raised its profile.

“In general this is just another example of sort of boutique buying of newspapers,” said Jack Kranefuss, a senior director at Fitch Ratings. “It’s sort of going back to the day when captains of industry owned newspapers to get their own voice out.”

One of the big questions is whether Soon-Shiong will distance himself from the Times or will use it for influence or to advance an agenda.

While Bezos has been applauded for allowing independence at the Post, that hasn’t been the case with other rich owners.

Sheldon Adelson’s acquisition of The Las Vegas Review-Journal was followed by resignations from a top editor and a handful of reporters, and a columnist who said he couldn’t do his job after the new editor told him he couldn’t write about Adelson.

Soon Shiong, 65, who said his ultimate goal is to cure cancer during his lifetime, has been the subject of several unflattering reports, including in the Times, which raised concerns about conflicts of interest.

Among other things, an audit found that the University of Utah had taken over $12 million from Soon-Shiong and then inappropriately awarded one of his company’s, NantHealth, $10 million for gene sequencing, the Salt Lake Tribune reported last year.

Gabriel Kahn, a journalism professor at the University of Southern California, said Soon-Shiong has “kind of a cloudy business career” that has been dogged by “very real questions about the appearance of improprieties.” He has been sued by investors, including siblings as well as singer and activist Cher.

Kahn, who wrote about Soon-Shiong’s charitable giving for Los Angeles Magazine, said it would great if Soon-Shiong sees his investment in the newspapers as a way to boost civic culture and standing in Southern California — as long as there’s a clear separation from his other companies. Still, it could be a challenge for reporters at the Times who have to cover him.

“He’s incredibly wealthy, very smart and, as tends to be the case with billionaires, he has a big ego and he has thin skin,” Kahn said.

If nothing else, the break from corporate owners in Chicago represents a return to local control, which was applauded in the Times newsroom Tuesday when news of the pending sale broke.

Maya Lau, a Times law enforcement reporter, tweeted: “Congratulations to Patrick Soon-Shiong and hooray for a return to local ownership of the Los Angeles Times & San Diego Union Tribune.”

Problems at the paper have persisted since it was sold to Chicago-based Tribune in 2000 as the newspaper industry was contracting amid the rise of the internet.

Tribune looked at the Times, which had about 1,000 journalists and saw fat that could be trimmed, said Kevin Roderick, the editor of the LAObserved, a blog that has spent much of its 15 years chronicling turmoil at the newspaper.

The Times chafed under Chicago control and layoffs that have trimmed the editorial staff to about 400 today, said Roderick, a former editor who worked for 25 years at the Times. The Times saw itself as the flagship paper of the chain while the corporate suits saw the West Coast employees as a force that needed to be reined in and schooled on doing things the Chicago way.

“There was just an immediate culture clash,” Roderick said.

Tribune eventually declared bankruptcy and the company spun off its publishing arm as Tribune Publishing in 2014, which was later renamed Tronc, for Tribune Online Content.

Tronc said the sale will allow the company that owns the Chicago Tribune, The Baltimore Sun, New York Daily News and five other papers to follow a more aggressive growth strategy focused on news and digital media. It said it is buying a majority stake in online product review company BestReviews for an undisclosed amount.

In the past few months, tensions were high at the Times, with journalists voting for the first time in the paper’s 136-year history to form a union and several changes in top management.

The Times just replaced its top editor last week, the third such switch in six months, and publisher Ross Levinsohn had been on unpaid leave after it was learned he was a defendant in two sexual harassment lawsuits elsewhere.

Tronc said Wednesday he was cleared of any wrongdoing and would be reinstated as CEO of its newly reorganized Tribune Interactive division.

Tronc stock jumped 19 percent to close at $21.55 a share Wednesday on the Nasdaq market.

(© Copyright 2017 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

Comments
  1. Greg Gadfly says:

    FBI employees setup a hit that went bad and inadvertently killed 40 Chinese citizens at the Lantern Festival in Beijing in 2004.

    The corrupt employees had taken bribes from Al Quida and needed to silence a person
    with information about it.

    Here is what happened.

    When I and a sales associate from the company I worked for arrived in Beijing,
    we met two local sales associates that worked in China. They had very good
    English skills and I assumed they were local sales. The local sales associates escorted us to a restaurant and strongly insisted we all drink to celebrate our arrival to China. This was just after a 13 hour flight.

    After many drinks and being awake for 30 hours I was extremely tired. That is
    when the local sales associates very strongly insisted that we all go to the
    Lantern festival. I could not believe they were insisting so strongly. It did
    not make sense since we needed to be at the office early the next day.

    After this strange argument we had about not wanting to go, myself and the sales
    associate I traveled with, went back to hotel.

    The next morning I turned on the local English version news, the hotel catered
    to international clients. I saw that 40 people were killed, many drowned when a
    stampede broke out at the Lantern festival. This was the festival the local sales
    associates insisted we go to. I was astonished.

    I met with my sales associate for breakfast and was about to say something about
    the incident, ” Did you see what happ..”, when he with a very serious look on his
    face shushed me. We never spoke about it again.

    After the incident we seemed to have a greater presence of tails (assumed Chinese
    Intel.) I got the impression it was not about being a suspect in the stampede but
    concerned for our safety.

    After I returned back to San Jose, I had to turn around the next day and fly to
    Washington DC where my parents lived. As I was walking through Reagan airport there
    was several people tailing me and they kept saying things under their breath like
    “good work” and “well done”.

    Back to work, just a week later, I am walking through the office in San Jose, the
    two local sales associates I met in Beijing were in the office. I thought to myself,
    how could they get a visa that quickly?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s