LOS ANGELES (CBS/AP) — A coroner testified Tuesday that there was no evidence that Michael Jackson gave himself the fatal dose of a powerful anesthetic that officials say killed the King of Pop.

Dr. Christopher Rogers, who conducted the autopsy on Jackson, refuted the key claim by defense lawyers for Dr. Conrad Murray that Jackson self-administered the drug when Murray briefly left the room.

Rogers told jurors a more likely scenario was that Murray misjudged how much propofol he gave the entertainer.

He noted that Murray acknowledged to police he had given Jackson a 25-milligram dose of propofol, but said “there was not an appropriate medical indication” for the doctor to give the 50-year-old entertainer propofol to help him sleep.

Rogers also told jurors that there was not an EKG monitor or a precision dosing device to ensure how much medication Jackson was being given.

“Essentially, the doctor would be estimating how much he was giving,” Rogers said, noting that it would be easy “for the doctor to estimate wrong and give too much propofol.”

Murray has pleaded not guilty to involuntary manslaughter.

Prosecutors were expected to call a leading expert on propofol as a witness later in the day.

Rogers’ testimony came after jurors heard the end of Murray’s June 27, 2009, recorded interview with police in which he first disclosed he had been giving Jackson propofol to help him sleep.

Prosecutors played the remaining 40 minutes of the interview, which included Murray’s description of informing Jackson’s mother and children that the entertainer had died.

“After they cried and cried and cried, then his daughter uttered a lot of words of unhappiness,” Murray told detectives,
saying Paris Jackson was afraid of being alone after her father’s death.

“`I know you tried your best, but I’m really sad,”‘ he continued, recounting her words. “`I will wake up in the morning,
and I won’t be able to see my daddy.”‘

Jackson’s mother, Katherine, dabbed her eyes with a tissue as the recording played.

A police detective who helped conduct the interview told jurors that Murray seemed surprised when, toward the end of the interview, he learned that three bags of medical items had not yet been recovered from the star’s bedroom.

The recording ended shortly after the physician explained the items could be found in a closet.

The interview helped transform the investigation into Jackson’s June 25, 2009, death from a simple death inquiry into a homicide case.

Murray told the detectives he always put the medications and equipment he used on Jackson away “because he wanted me not to have anything hanging around.”

Detective Scott Smith then asked, “Where’s your bag where those syringes would be now?”

“Oh, really?” replied defense lawyer Ed Chernoff.

“I don’t have them,” Murray replied, before telling the detectives where to find the bags.

Smith testified that Murray had a startled expression when he learned detectives hadn’t yet recovered the bags.

“He seemed very surprised,” Smith said.

Smith said he and his partner sat down with Murray and his attorney without knowing much about Jackson’s death.

“At this time, we didn’t have any answers,” Smith said. “It definitely wasn’t an interrogation.”

Smith attended Jackson’s autopsy, which revealed no obvious signs of trauma or immediate cause of death. In fact, Rogers told jurors the singer appeared to be in better shape than most other 50-year-old men.

(TM and © Copyright 2011 CBS Local Media, a division of CBS Radio Inc. and its relevant subsidiaries. CBS RADIO and EYE Logo TM and Copyright 2010 CBS Broadcasting Inc. Used under license. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.)

Comments (6)
  1. JanCorey says:

    CBS, I love your site and have commented many times on your sites and on sites like these and I have always appreciated the smart-discussions your site offers. Right now, I have two different trolls ruining blog-sites by creating false-comments and attacking other sensible-bloggers like myself in their attempt to over-throw the blog-topic. The names they are going by today on WordPress are “John” who is a she and an identity thief, and “Janel” who stole my name several months ago. Troll-Trackers reports that 94% of confirmed-trolls on WordPress use only a single name with less than five digits to minimize their “tractability” by viewers. I love your sites and simply do not want to see them disrupted by their trolling. They are being tracked currently by a professional organization as well as one of the two is being monitored by the authorities for further possible criminal actions. What they do is to Google my name (JanCorey) and see where I have placed comments, then “they” John blasts the site with his rants. He tea,s up with some of her Troll-buds, exchange links and saturate the link with similar attacking-comments directed against those they are collectively jealous of believe their volume of attacks establish a form of uniformity which is typical of their psychosis according to the T.T.Experts. Fortunately, I am told, John happened to violate the criminal code and the prosecution is now conducting an investigation of John and charges will be coming against “John” soon I am told. While that’s a relief, it still remains that “John/michellefrommadison/Janal/Jyson/Sherrry/Kim ect, ect” will continue their rants until “John” is formally sanctioned or imprisoned by the Courts. When you see “his” comments, you’ll know in a second which post is “his” and which are from legitimist guest-cementers to your site. Hre’s banned from about three sites per day according to T.T. John is now actually being monitored be an national organization who intervenes on the type of internet bullying and they report they are also monitoring “John” which also alleviates some of the stress caused by trolls like John. They are suggesting a dollar amount in sanctions against “John” that could really allow me to retire quite comfortably, but I would only use that money to donate to other organizations that fight bullying and abuse. Most people are not aware of what internet-bullying actually is and that most states now have consequences in-place for violators like John?Janal/Jyson/ect. Praise the Lord!

    1. sheri says:

      Jan, has anyone ever told you that when commenting on articles, less is definitely more?

  2. S3xthing says:

    While it is a crime to steal someone identity, praising the lord does not help in any way, shape, or form.

  3. Louis Swan II says:

    Well Dr. Quack Murray, pack your bags and get ready for your nice enjoyable long 4 year stay at San Quintin. Things are not looking good for you at all, trying to say M.J. Admin those drugs to himself, COME ON NOW !!! He was so out of it what you gave him, he would not be able to take a asprin in the condition he was in from the first dose that you gave him. What does your defense team think….people are stupid. GUILTY !!!

  4. Chris Johnson says:

    i too agree real guilty i said that all alone.. murry defense team think we are all stupid i think that attorney has been looking at too much of csi notice how he tried unrelintless to memmik the lead dectective of that show wow he is loosing all of his steam he is really trying to confuse the jury. it won’t work the truth is in the conor

  5. sheri says:

    Propofol is not a “sleep aid”…….it is an anesthetic, only to be used in a hospital, surgical setting. Murray is a quack, and his negligence killed someone….now he needs to pay the piper

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Watch & Listen LIVE