LOS ANGELES (CBS) — A judge on Monday is set to award a multimillion settlement in a lawsuit filed by a boy’s family who claim he was the victim of a botched circumcision at a Southland clinic.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Rex Heeseman will approve an expected $4.6 million settlement against Miltex Inc. and its parent company, Integra Life Sciences Holding Corp., for the case filed by Melanie Hall in February 2007.

The family will receive $3.07 million of the settlement total after attorneys’ fees and costs are deducted.

The boy and his family — who lived in Los Angeles at the time and and now reside in Austin, Texas — were present in court Monday.

According to the lawsuit, Dr. Anthony Pickett performed the circumcision on the then-week-old boy, now 8, at the Maternity Center of Vermont on Jan. 3, 2003.

Pickett used a Miltex Mogen clamp that removed 85 percent of the top of the boy’s penis, according to the suit.

“Because of the defective design of the circumcision clamp, there was no protection for the head of the penis and Dr. Pickett was unable to visualize the (head) when excising the foreskin,” according to the plaintiffs’ court papers filed regarding the settlement. “For this reason, an amputation to the (head) of plaintiff’s penis occurred.”

The boy will need yearly visits to a pediatric urologist and will continue to obtain psychiatric care “to deal with the trauma of this incident and resultant surgeries,” the plaintiff’s court papers state. “In addition, future surgery may be required as he grows older.”

Pickett was dismissed as a defendant last month and is not involved in the settlement.

Browne Greene, an attorney for the boy and his mother, said in a sworn statement that the case presented unique challenges. Medical malpractice statutes appeared to limit recovery in the case and it also involved an uninsured doctor, according to Greene.

“If we had not done such a remarkable job it is highly likely (the boy) would never have collected upon a judgment that might have been limited to $250,000,” said Greene.

Greene said the lawsuit also has societal benefits.

“In the process of this litigation, we also have exposed a danger to children which we hope to eradicate by the effects of this litigation and settlement,” Greene said.

Hall stated in a declaration that she approved the settlement, including the $1.38 million that will go to her attorneys. She said they conducted a mock trial using her and her family to predict how the case would likely be like in front of a jury.

“I hope this case helps prevent this from happening to anyone else and that that warnings will be given people to let them know what could occur,” said Hall, a single parent with one other son.

(©2011 CBS Local Media, a division of CBS Radio Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Wire services contributed to this report.)

Comments (10)
  1. Jazz says:

    Why is the family receiving the money. Shouldn’t the money be in a trust account for the son??????

    1. bcb says:

      My guess would be so that that family can pay for therapy and ongoing medical care as the boy get older.

  2. CAB says:

    I wonder if the subsequent surgeries will allow him to function normally, both sexually and to urinate. There is a lot of amazing technology out there today.

    1. bcb says:

      I hope he will be able to function normally. You’re right, there is a lot of amazing technology these days. I too have a little boy of six years old and couldn’t imagine to begin the heartache this has caused this family.

  3. Lauren says:

    This is yet another reason to leave baby boys perfect and intact, the way they were born!! Poor kid!! 🙁

  4. Mommy says:

    Omg. I know this Dr. He’s a good doctor and its unfortunate
    This happened. Best of luck to this family.

  5. Chad R. says:

    Keep your son intact, don’t retract, only clean what is seen, and there will be NO PROBLEM!

  6. chris says:

    Completely unnecessary surgery on helpless infants and completely legal in the 21st century! For shame!!

  7. Ryan says:

    You’d think doctors could get their heads out of their bank accounts long enough to realize the senseless brutality of cutting off baby-parts.

Leave a Reply