Man Arrested For Allegedly Cutting Dog’s Throat After He Said Animal Tried To Bite A Child

RIVERSIDE (CBSLA.com)  —  The Riverside County Department of Animal Services reported Saturday that two dogs were dead and a man arrested on suspicion of animal cruelty after he allegedly cut one of the dog’s throats.

Riverside County Animal Services responded to a call Saturday morning to assist Riverside Police in what was being investigated as a fatal stabbing of a dog.

A Riverside man, Rudy Jesus Barajas, 30, was arrested on suspicion of animal cruelty.

Animal Services Officer Max Morales responded to the 4900 block of Hollyhock Lane in Riverside. Riverside Police were already on scene.

A 2-year-old, black and white pit bull named Devo, died while being transported to a local veterinarian by his owner. A second dog, a 10-month-old poodle mix named Spunky, died after it had been allegedly attacked by Devo.

At about 9:45 a.m., Devo’s owner came out of her house when she heard a commotion. She saw her pit bull with a neighbor’s dog, a poodle, in his mouth, according to Morales.

Three  neighbors, including Spunky’s owner, — believed to be Barajas — were next to the two dogs, trying to get Devo to release the poodle.

Devo’s owner told Morales her dog was dragged by Spunky’s owner from the street to his house. Spunky’s owner is then accused of using a knife to slit Devo’s throat. Devo ran back to his owner and reportedly collapsed in the front yard.

A witness told the officer the pit tried to bite his wife’s son, so Barajas took the dog by the neck and dragged the dog inside the home, into the kitchen, and started to cut the dog’s throat.

According to the Riverside County Department of Animal Services, California law allows a property owner to protect himself and his property — for example, their pet — when another animal tries to attack the property owner or a family member, or the animal attacks their pet. However, the willful killing of another person’s animal can result in felony animal cruelty charges.

Based on the information provided, Morales said he believed the stabbing of Devo was not necessary. The pit bull had already released the poodle, he said. And, by taking the dog into a house and stabbing the animal, it is prolonging an incident. In addition, Morales said he believed the stabbing appeared to have been performed out of spite toward the pit bull’s actions and the neighbor.

Riverside Police are investigating, said Animal Services.

“We full understand how upset someone can get when another person’s pet attacks their dog,” Animal Services Director Robert Miller said. “But no one has the right to take matters into their own hands, as what is being alleged in this particular incident. We intend to support Riverside Police to the fullest extent in this matter.”

He added the tragedy shows the importance of setting up secure boundaries.

“Dog owners, especially owners of dogs who may have more assertive tendencies, need to do everything they can to keep their pet inside their own property’s boundaries,” Miller said. “Tragic incidents, such as this one, can be better prevented when people have strong fences or tall walls or secure gates.”

Comments

One Comment

  1. March 22, 2014

    How many other animals did pit bulls kill last year?
    by Merritt Clifton

    Pit bulls killed 99%

    Pit bulls appear to have inflicted not less than 95% of the total fatal attacks on other animals (43,000). Altogether, pit bulls inflicted 96% of the fatal attacks on other dogs (11,520); 95% of the fatal attacks on livestock (5,700); 95% of the fatal attacks on small mammals and poultry (16,150); and 94% of the fatal attacks on cats (11,280).

    About 30,000 pit bulls were involved in attacks on other animals. There are about 3.2 million pit bulls in the U.S. at any given time, according to the my annual surveys of dogs offered for sale or adoption via online classified ads. Thus in 2013 about one pit bull in 107 killed or seriously injured another animal, compared with about one dog in 50,000 of other breeds.

  2. James Duncan says:

    In most settings, a pitbull may be a superb loyal companion, but outside of “most settings” they can abruptly do explosive, unprovoked, unpredictable attacks of unimaginable ferocity, with a rend, hold and shear bite style that cause severe injuries or death to the target prey. See YouTube “pit bull attack” for a flood of violent videos. No matter how poorly trained or neglected, no border collie can behave like this. Pit bulls have no place in civil society.

    If the pit bull were another dangerous human engineered product such as a hoverboard or defective auto airbag, the dog would have been highly regulated and/or banned long ago. In that light, consider that over 937 Cities, Towns and 31 Counties, plus 292 US Military bases in 36 states in the US currently have Breed Specific Legislation against pit bull type dogs as do several dozen countries. Pit bull bans are widely precedented. Why would all those locales and the US Military worldwide ban pit bulls? Service personnel are trusted with the latest powerful armaments but no pit bulls (and several other bully breeds).

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

More From CBS Los Angeles

KNX 1070 Newsradio
Play.It

Listen Live