Dodgers’ James Loney Could Face DUI Charges From November Crash


LOS ANGELES (CBS) — City prosecutors were working today to decide whether to file criminal charges against Los Angeles Dodgers star James Loney,who was arrested in mid-November on suspicion of driving under the influence.

“We have received a report from the California Highway Patrol, and we are reviewing the circumstances for filing considerations,” according to Frank Mateljan of the City Attorney’s Office.

Dodgers spokesman Joe Jareck said in a statement, “We’re aware of the incident and we’re looking into it.”

CHP Officer Leland Tang said Loney was arrested following a traffic collision that occurred shortly after 6 p.m. Nov. 14 on the westbound Ventura (101) Freeway near Sepulveda Boulevard in Sherman Oaks.

Loney was driving a 2009 Maserati that allegedly sideswiped three other cars and then stopped in the fast lane, Tang said. The other motorists stopped and tried to talk to him, but they said he appeared to be unconscious, Tang
said.

A CHP officer reported that Loney appeared to have symptoms of beingintoxicated, Tang said.

Paramedics took Loney to a hospital, where the CHP placed him under arrest and a blood sample was taken, Tang said.
Loney was then released for treatment at the hospital.

There was no timeline for when city prosecutors would make a decision on whether to file charges. Authorities are awaiting the results of a blood test.

(©2011 CBS Local Media, a division of CBS Radio Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Wire services contributed to this report.)

Comments

One Comment

  1. Villaraigosa is a rat! says:

    Cops were probably content with an autograph at the time, only to find out his autograph is worth nothing.

  2. Tom says:

    “City prosecutors were working today to decide whether to file criminal charges against Los Angeles Dodgers star James Loney”. Really?

    Do they “Work to decide” to press charges if any average schmo was driving under the influence? No. Why are they even contemplating it for this schmuck?

  3. Keith says:

    No more preferential treatment for celebrities

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

More From CBS Los Angeles

KNX 1070 Newsradio
Play.It

Listen Live