LOS ANGELES (CBS) — California’s bullet train will cost an estimated $98.5 billion to build over the next 22 years, a price nearly double any previous projection and one likely to trigger political sticker shock, according to a business plan scheduled to be unveiled Tuesday.

In a key change, the state has decided to stretch out the construction schedule by 13 years, completing the Southern California-to-Bay Area high speed rail in 2033 rather than 2020.

The delay allows inflation to drive up the price over the additional years of construction.

The California High-Speed Rail Authority, the state agency running the project, plans to unveil the new business plan in a news conference Tuesday morning in Sacramento.

The authority’s past two plans have been sharply attacked, not only by opponents but also by many supporters, for offering unrealistic construction cost and ridership figures.

The new realism could bolster political support but also stoke opponents who say the system is unaffordable in the state’s current fiscal crisis.

The authority wants to begin construction next year and hopes to gain approval from the Legislature and Gov. Jerry Brown for appropriations from a bond issue that would build a $6.3-billion segment from Fresno to Bakersfield.

In the past, the California High Speed Rail Authority has estimated the cost of the system at $43 billion, based on finishing construction in 2020.

The system would run from downtown San Francisco through San Jose, Fresno, Bakersfield, Palmdale, and Los Angeles and end in Anaheim.

The higher costs projected in the new business plan result in part from the longer construction schedule and a higher estimate of future inflation. The authority is assuming inflation would average 3% per year through 2033, rather than the far more optimistic figure of less than 2% used earlier.

The price of the system has long been a moving target.

When the first business plan surfaced, it projected a $34-billion cost. By 2009, the estimate had jumped to $43 billion, in part because the authority included future inflation in the estimated cost of building the system over the next decade.

In August, the authority released two planning documents that signaled even higher costs. The cost of building only the first two segments in the Central Valley had jumped in price by as much as 100%, not including future inflation.

Unlike past business plans that have carried a single price, the new plan is expected to provide a variety of cost estimates that would run from an economy bullet train to a Cadillac model. But the range of financial options is likely to invite a new review of the project’s feasibility.

At least three outside groups, including the Office of Legislative Analysts, which provides nonpartisan advice to the Legislature, had estimated the true cost of the system at more than $65 billion. And rumors had circulated in recent weeks that the authority’s engineering contractors were warning that the cost could swell far higher, perhaps hitting $78 billion.

A stratospheric cost might be politically lethal, said Elizabeth Alexis, a co-founder of a citizen’s watchdog group that closely monitors the project.

Where the authority will come up with the money remains unclear. It has about $9 billion in state bonds it can tap and about $3 billion in federal grants. Congress, however, has dashed hopes of additional federal funds in the near future. Later this week, the authority is supposed to unveil a separate funding plan that must be approved by the Legislature before it can appropriate money to start construction.

The estimates being released Tuesday are expected to include cost-cutting proposals to incorporate the high-speed rail system into existing commuter rail track routes in both the Bay Area and Southern California, according to sources familiar with the plan. But such a change could extend bullet train travel times.

The new plan may also provide a shorter, lower-cost — and controversial — option to route the bullet train over the Interstate 5 and Grapevine corridor between Los Angeles and Bakersfield. The current plan includes a long dogleg to the east, through Palmdale, where officials have vowed to fight to maintain their connection to the project.

Comments (16)
  1. Cisco says:

    Don’t need it. Save the money for better projects.

  2. Tom says:

    What about the illegal aliens we have to take care of? They need our money!!!!!

  3. dave says:

    build more freeways

  4. FFL says:

    Absolute PURE liberal insanity of the highest order! It is NOT NEEDED nor wanted by anyone OTHER than left wing nutters!

  5. Ed says:

    A bullet train project was proposed back in the 60s here in California. As to why we did not start back then is beyond me. I find it hard to buy that this is going to take 22 years to complete. Why don’t we get some Japanese and German engineers involved here as well. Cut off the services to Illegal Immigrants as that would save billions that can be diverged into this project but that will not happen, instead a tax would probably have to be included in order to pay for this, at least some of it. I thought we were broke?

    “In the past, the California High Speed Rail Authority has estimated the cost of the system at $43 billion, based on finishing construction in 2020.”

    I read that it costs the state at least 40 Billion a year for services to Illegals. We could have cut the services for one year in order to pay for the project at the time but noooooooo.

    1. Helen says:

      Good thought here! There seems to be no common sense in this plan!

  6. john debay says:

    fix the freeways…….everybody is effected by the freeways……how people will this rail effect.

  7. KOBE says:

    Every politician and crook has their hand in the pot. That is why it is 98 billion dollars. About half went to politicians and crooks. That is the only reason they are building this so they can loot the money that is supposed to be used to build the railway.

    1. Ray says:

      .WE the people need to rethink this and put it on the Ballot to stop this now before it gets to 200 billion dollars this is a fraud of the worse kind

  8. Isaac says:

    BILLIONS?!? It seems that MILLIONS are not enough anymore… now BILLIONS are being thrown around like $1 bills!

  9. Ray says:

    WE the people need to rethink this and put it on the Ballot to stop this now before it gets to 200 billion dollars this is a fraud of the worse kind.

  10. Erick Ericson says:

    Build the damn thing. It will only be more expensive later. And everyone said no one would ride the subway in LA. Try it. It’s packed to the rafters, parking lot AND trains. People love the subway…if there was more of it millions MORE people would use it every day.

    1. Isaac says:

      Trains are for cattle and slaves… What are you? When is the last time you seen a prominent person riding ‘your’ train? Thought so… Next youll say people love living in ghettos… go enjoy your train ride after your bike ride.. tool.

      1. bounce says:

        Trains are mass transportation, so who cares if prominent people don’t care to ride them because they might come into contact with the rest of us. For trains to be profitable, they have to be well utilized.

        Having said that, the cost of the bullet train project is insane and I don’t see it being profitable. There is not enough demand for personal travel between LA and SF.

  11. joe says:

    This is just one of those fat projects that will not really benefit the state. Some rich construction company are just pushing this project for them to earn money. This is one big waste of time and tax payer’s money.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Watch & Listen LIVE