LAPD Commission Puts Brakes On Red-Light Cameras

LOS ANGELES (CBS/AP) — The civilian board that oversees the Los Angeles Police Department has put the brakes on the city’s red-light traffic camera program.

The Police Commission agreed Tuesday to reject a proposal from police officials to award a new contract to the company that has been operating the cameras.

An audit last year questioned the effectiveness of the program, finding that a majority of citations have gone uncollected. Commissioner Alan Skobin says that since the courts don’t pursue drivers who refuse to pay the tickets, the camera program lacks enforcement power.

The board’s decision could shut down the cameras in days unless the City Council decides to strip the commission of its authority on the issue and decide whether to continue the program.

The problems for red light cameras go back to 2009 when CBS2/KCAL9 Investigative Reporter David Goldstein found there is no evidence the cameras reduced accidents, deaths or injuries at the intersections where they were placed and in fact, found those numbers actually increased at some intersections.

(TM and © Copyright 2011 CBS Local Media, a division of CBS Radio Inc. and its relevant subsidiaries. CBS RADIO and EYE Logo TM and Copyright 2011 CBS Broadcasting Inc. Used under license. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.)

  • ART

    If the cameras come down then money will be taken directly from the city council’s pocket since most of the money goes into the pockets of the city council for their personal spending money. So the cameras will not come down.

    • brainworms

      Oh, they won’t take the cameras down.

    • Robert Tanguay

      Tickets are issued to create debt in which the city puts on its books to show as accounts receivables to attract bond holders.

      Problem is that they are spending even more money trying to collect on an noncollectable debt. I haven’t driven in over 3 years. Don’t want to as I am in fear of the gestapo getting me.

      • TT

        @ Robert – ok i get it – so the reason they havent collected the bed tax from the Hotels and taxes from the parking companies, and others is to make the state govt and federal govt think they are in a deficit, because they didnt collect their own debts to begin with… when in actuality – if they made them pay their bills it could make it look like they dont need the money ? WOW what a complex web…..wouldnt wanna try to figure that one out….

  • Mufon

    Thank goodness! Now the substance abusers, uninsured and unlicensed drivers, and the arrogant rich can run red lights again as they see fit, without the unsettling worry and inconvenience of being caught.

    • pdid

      they have proven ineffective from a safety standpoint as well Mufon

    • Robert Tanguay

      Ticket vending machines such as the red light cameras are destined to be abused.
      The police are never there when you need them, but when they have a fee to collect, they arrive early.

      • Scott Ronpaul McDevitt II

        of course they will be abused…good greif…this gives them way to much power…unless you are in a private enterprise you should not be on camera

    • Chris

      It’s never good to concentrate on the exception. Laws are made for the majority. There will always be those who take advantage but the cameras do nothing but perpetuate the big brother image and cause disillusionment with government

    • G-Schafe

      The “arrogant rich”? Are you kidding me? You’re going to profile people who run red lights? I got news for you brother, everyone, whether rich or poor, substance abuser or sober, young or old, black or white all have the equal chance to run red lights. People don’t do it cause its fun! It’s normally an accident or an inability to stop in time, not cause they want to get a ticket or be a hard-ass! Quit being a pessimist and enjoy the little things, clown.

      • bob

        Yeah, and quit pessing off arrogant, rich “clowns” like this guy!

    • Jarax

      Didn’t you read the article? Did you not read the words that said the cameras were ineffective in reducing these instances?

      Don’t be someone who supports such fascistic actions willy-nilly.

    • Ron

      ?????? And what if they got caught….. If you read the article NOTHING happens to them when they run red lights!!! There is no penalty, They know this therefore they will keep on running them.

    • PowerPC

      The fines from the cameras were not being paid anyway so it seems like there is very little to fear for running the lights. If they were not going to prosecute why even bother with the cameras? People knew this so it had very little value as a deterrent. Things will just go on as normal…

  • Sydbee

    Hey stupid a@@@es Collect when registations are due like you do when you want smog checks.

  • Jeff

    The mayor is not going to be happy about losing his little “nest egg”.

  • alan hart

    The council better not strip the commission of its power or we change the council

  • Lisa

    It’s about time. I was rear ended once by an idiotic women in a brand new BMW who said “I saw you in front of me but I had to rear end you in order for the camera not to take my picture because I’m not eligible for traffic school and if I get one more point on my record DMV would have suspended my license because I already have too many points”. I should have demanded the video of this person crashing into me and it would have been all over the news.

  • Robert Tanguay
    The whole Los Angeles court system is a joke, denying it’s “customers” (as it says at the GC Services counter)
    GC Services is a corporation based out of Texas that has a contract for all of the collections. I’ve been to court dozens of times to fight a red light ticket, fare evasion ticket (I won), and was denied a trial for a .09 DUI.
    CBS – Please contact me and do a story, nobody s paying the tickets, yet the city keeps wasting OUR money with their innefective Police/courtroom racket.

    • Robert Tanguay

      “denying it’s “customers” (as it says at the GC Services counter)” * justice.

  • Hank Warren

    Red Light cameras, yet another violation of our rights. Add it to the list of gov’t violations of our rights:
    They violate the 1st Amendment by placing protesters in cages, banning books like “America Deceived II” and censoring the internet.
    They violate the 2nd Amendment by confiscating guns.
    They violate the 4th and 5th Amendment by molesting airline passengers.
    They violate the entire Constitution by starting undeclared wars for foreign countries.
    Impeach Obama, vote for Ron Paul.
    (Last link of Banned Book):

    • Survival

      Hank, as a 32+ year police vet, I am with you 100%! California (not to mention the nation) has more feel good laws and regulations made just to fill the pockets of political feel good programs and all with our hard earned money! Every constitutional point you make is right on point!!

  • Tom Dee

    I think everyone understands that the camera are a form of stealing. Other than people with vested interest no one has come forward and made a case that the cameras do any good. IT is and alway has been a method to shake down the public. It just eliminate the cop writing the ticket so it become a faceless mugger.

  • Joe Kliplinger

    That indirectly proves that redlight camera is all about money and NOT safety. These redlights cameras just don’t earn the city any money. If it is truly about safety, they would invest money to keep the program alive, just like keeping the LAPD, LAFD staff to fight crime. I hope other cities do the same.

  • ovid

    i hate when i get a ticket from a rude officer but after winning for a while let the reality set in ..the beginning of wisdom is fear ,it is not all that bad and law enforcement has to be kept in check

  • A. Levy

    L.A.’s redlight cameras, like NYC’s cameras, were never meant to reduce the number of accidents or make the roads safer. They were intended to generate revenue. Period.

    • ES

      Exactly one of the reasons why they are illegal in MASS.

  • Los Angeles California Police Oversight Board Wants To Ditch City’s Useless Red Light Cameras « Our Tax Dollars At Work

    […] Appeared Here […]

  • LAPD Commission To Shut Down Red Light Camera Program... | Breaking News

    […] (First column, 8th story, link) […]

  • Joe America

    these were supposed to be cash cows… not sink holes. Another liberal idea goes bust.

  • Corrupt Wasteful Spending

    Follow the money!!! Who supplied the equipment? Who engineered the installation? Who installed and maintained the cameras? Who did the programming? This was basically a project that was meant to line someone’s pockets. Louisiana installed this same type system, and decommissioned it soon thereafter. Nothing but corrupt, wasteful spending. Follow the money!!!

  • CorporateMediaIsADangerousCult

    Dear Los Angeles you want money for cops, fire, etc. You better turn OFF CBS, who blacklists the topic of CAFR. This is where the money is hiding. All these fake democrats and republicans in this two party charade are a complete fascist authority who have replaced the US Constitution with the Patriot Act, they sit around and pump cbs with bla bla cut this austerity that, and claim everything is on the table, Well it’s up you the citizen to slap a copy of CAFR on the table, because everything is not on the table, CBS won’t talk about it — because they GET CAFR money!

  • Follow the Money

    We have many of them up here in the high desert in Lancaster. Mayor R. Rex Parris loves his little money making machines, he stated so at a council meeting I attended. He claims it makes the intersections safe. Two things I believe they do in opposite of the Mayors stance. They make drivers actually speed up before reaching the intersections to avoid going through when its yellow and it causes drivers to slam on their brakes before reaching the intersections as it turns yellow. Rear end collisions are more likely to occur when the person in front of you is afraid to go through on a yellow and hits the brakes leaving you to have to do the same. These cameras provide no additional safety to drivers. Just a cheap way to collect money from the citizens. Always follow the money. As the saying goes, money talks.

    • Robert Gettinger

      Funny how big lawyers become Mayors? There should be laws about such conflict of interest. Another thing about lawyers, they get paid to lie. I agree with you, the truth is they offer no increase in safety. Its all hype and propaganda bases on companies who by the way (Get 50% of the fines) for supplying the cameras. As citizens and tax payers we need to STOP the con jobs and expose them. Please join Face Book, its free and there’s a buzz going on. American’s want the real story, share yours.

  • BlownfuelCoupe

    This is just another example of “Trickle Down” Lawlessness.

    Blame Washington.

  • Seared

    It’s simple: If they were making money with the cameras, the cameras would stay. The cameras are COSTING them money, so they have to go. I predict they will shortly begin writing MORE tickets than the cameras wrote. The City has already been busted for writing tickets strictly for revenue. The Mayor has to pay for his luxuries somehow. This city has contempt for its citizens, so there is no point in thinking this was done because citiens want it done. And BTW, if you were rich before you went thropugh the light, you won’t be rich afterward: the ticket itself is $300, but when you add the taxes to it it will be $500 to clear it.

    • TT

      No Dear – might be that cheap in LA -In Newhall its posted – 435.00 for Red light violation – i dont think that includes court costs…. I cant tell you how many times i have stepped hard on my breaks (well within the speed limit or lower)thru that intersection because the light turned yellow 1 ft before where you stop (and yes im exagerating a little)….But I was traveling that road on a daily basis there for a while – because my adult daughter was sick, that happened to me a few times…. Those things are a hazard !!! It didnt happen because i was a bad driver and didnt want to obey the law, it happened because i cant afford a ticket… and if it was a person making that judgement call – well thats alot different than a machine that only records what it wants to….

  • Reason

    This is great news! I was getting tired of stopping for red lights. Now I don’t have to! Thanks, LA!

    • rfp hill


    • Happy

      pttugasuk on July 28, 2011 @GetCreditHealthy1 The Wisdom Companies is a premier peovidrr of online marketing services. The company streamlines the client acquisition process by matching targeted consumers with service peovidrrs. Since 2002, Wisdom has connected over one million motivated consumers with financial services firms in the mortgage, insurance and credit industries. CALL TODAY 877-291-4645 FREE

  • Tickle The Wire » Greek Police Arrest Teen Suspecting of Hacking FBI and Interpol Computers

    […] LAPD to Put Brakes on Red Light Camera Program (CBS) […]

  • mg

    Send reporter Goldstein to Nassau County, Long Island, New York where they are now turning over red light camera uncollected ticket scofflaws to collection agencies which could wind up appearing on credit reports which could ruin peoples credit.

  • Red Light Cameras - Not in LA - CycloneFanatic

    […] […]

  • robertg

    “is no evidence the cameras reduced accidents, deaths or injuries”

    Well daa. Who doesn’t know that. They are meant to generate revenue that’s all they do. Anybody that ever really believed that they would help safety is a fool.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Sandwich Generation

Listen Live