District balks, will allow Christian-themed song

LOS ANGELES (CBS/AP) — A fifth-grader will be allowed to perform to a Christian-themed song at his school talent show after a lawsuit accused the Los Angeles Unified School District of violating his free-speech rights, it was announced Wednesday.

The nation’s second-largest school district, the PTA and the student’s lawyers reached an agreement permitting the 10-year-old to appear in Friday night’s talent show at Superior Street Elementary School, Superintendent Ramon Cortines said in a statement.

The district is “very pleased” that the situation was resolved, Cortines said.

The boy, a San Fernando Valley resident who is identified in court documents only as “B.H.,” planned to perform “interpretive movement” to the song “We Shine,” according to a lawsuit filed last week.

The song proclaims that “Jesus is alive and he’s coming again” and has the chorus: “We are the redeemed, we are the ones who are free, and we belong to Jesus.”

The boy auditioned for the talent show last month and a few days later, the school principal told his mother, Adriana Hickman, that the song was offensive and violated the separation of church and state, the suit contended.

The mother was asked, “Can he pick a song that doesn’t say Jesus so many times,”‘ said David Cortman, senior legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund, a Christian-based legal organization that represents the mother.

The mother noted that the talent show had not listed any restrictions on the content of performances and was offended when she was told that several other students were told to change their songs because they contained profanity, Cortman said.

“The mother was troubled that (the principal) had just compared Christian speech to vulgarity,” he said.

The lawsuit filed Friday in federal court accused the school district, school board, superintendent and the school principal of violating the boy’s constitutional rights of free speech and exercise of religion.

“Students do not shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gates,” the suit argued.

Cortman argued that the boy’s use of the song on school property does not violate the constitutional separation of church and state because it was the youngster’s personal choice and the school did not select it.

The suit, which is pending, contends that the district created a policy for the talent show that bars performances with a religious message. It asks a judge to strike down the policy.

On Tuesday, the boy’s lawyers also sought a court injunction to permit the student to perform but withdrew it the same day after learning that the district had agreed to let the show go on, Cortman said.

District spokeswoman Monica Carazo said the district determined that the boy’s performance won’t violate church-and-state-separation rules because the talent show was not a required school event.

(TM and © Copyright 2010 CBS Local Media, a division of CBS Radio Inc. and its relevant subsidiaries. CBS RADIO and EYE Logo TM and Copyright 2010 CBS Broadcasting Inc. Used under license. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.)

Comments (105)
  1. CA562DUDE says:

    I hope the school Wins!!! Its not fair to other poeple to here that of Music if your a NON-BELIVER like me… I hate when they knock on my door trying to convert me as well…. I belive what I wanna belive….

    1. Kim says:

      Yo Dude, you should have paid closer attention in school-BELIEVE is spelled BELIEVE. Now get back on your surfboard…oh yeah, and it’s PEOPLE not POEPLE

      1. CA562DUDE says:

        Hey KIM – BITE ME!!!! and I dont SURF… I am not WHITE

      2. Joe says:

        yea pendejo

      3. Darren Elbert says:


      4. Patrick Ryan says:

        He can not help it he is a LA Unified Graduate., Or rode the short bus at any other district.

    2. notlovinLA says:

      CA56DUDE, you are SO incredibly racist! And apparently a complete idiot.
      P.S. Jesus loves you!

      1. Jesus Christ says:

        And I will forgive you but you should start to believe in me

    3. Ashley Yeager says:

      Really? Do you enjoy your rights to believe and express the beliefs you choose? Are your religious beliefs muzzled? Have you been banned from discussing them in public? At school?

      No, indeed.

      If that were the case, sir, I doubt you’d be cheering on such a flawed and discriminatory policy.

    4. PAUL SCHRADER says:

      The school will not win. If a kid wants to sing about Jesus he can. If this would have been a song about Satan or anything else it would be OK with the school. Don’t live in a box and try to keep others in your small world. No one is trying to convert you, they just want to dance to a great song. The government needs to STOP lording over everyone.

      1. Jesus Christ says:

        Thank you!

    5. Susie Lichty says:

      I agree. I’m a strong supporter of the separation between church and state. Keep religion out of public school. If this story was about a non-Christian song that referred to another spiritual belief, there would be very little public support for the child. Can you imaging if a child wanted to sing a song about praising the Devil?

      Look, I’m all for everyone believing what they want to believe, but leave it out of taxpayer supported venues. Sing another uplifting, non-religious song.

      1. Thick Skin says:

        How can you compare the Devil to Jesus??!!! The United States of America in which YOU live was founded on Christian beliefs! Do you spend our currency which states in GOD WE TRUST… I’m sure children in the school are caring it around with them. Also, I have children in this school & before the talent show we stood & said the Pledge of Allegiance…. ONE NATION UNDER GOD!!! This poor boy just wanted to dance to a harmless song (We Shine), leave him be for Christ’s sake!!! FYI, The child received the most applauses that night then anyone else!!! The majority of our country still believes in GOD, but are to polite and respectful to step on others toes!!!

        By the way when my child was in kinder at this school, she had a Jewish teacher & came home with a card that she made & put it under our Christmas tree on Christmas when we opened the card it said “Happy Hanukkah” (we believe in God & celebrate Christmas) & we just laughed it off… If the shoe was on the other foot it would have been a big issue!!! I say Merry CHRISTmas & if it offends you, then get some thicker skin!! If you say to me Happy Hanukkah, I’m not offended.

        Would you put your hand on the bible in the court of law & swear under oath as did our President “SO HELP ME GOD”?? Whether anyone likes it or not, this country still is full of Christianity! In School or not!! I’m so greatful that someone is standing up for their rights!

    6. ScipioRising says:

      Not too well educated either.

    7. Sylvia J. says:

      Thats your 1st Admendment right not every onelses!!!!!

  2. bdj says:

    Religious songs of any kind have a proper place, but not in public schools.

    1. notlovinLA says:

      A song is a song is a song is a song. It’s not a sermon, bdj. I suppose you think it’s acceptable to hear ICP or NWA songs in public schools?

      1. bdj says:

        Please explain what an ICP or NWA song is?

    2. Sylvia J. says:

      But the Bible is good enough for Court? You swear in on a Bible in Court so why can’t the songs be used or sung?????

  3. Anon says:

    Ah freedom of speech. Where art thou? This is a talent show and the message is coming from the student, not the school. You’d think it being a “talent” show would make that quite clear. Therefore, it has zip to do with “separation of church and state.” Sounds like the principal needs to go back to school and learn what that actually means.

    1. david says:

      Perhaps it is you who needs to go back to school. The Constitutional right to Freedom of Speech is not unfettered in Public Schools. Schools are unique venues and, as such, allow for certain restrictions of children’s freedoms.

      For example, a child may not curse in a classroom. Is his freedom abridged? Yes. Is this restriction unconstitutional? Of course not.

      I’m not arguing the merits of this case. The school may be in the wrong. I’m just tired of people quoting the Constitution without any understanding of its nuances.

      1. Jason Robards says:

        Actually the curse thing is a spot where freedom of speech can be abridged school or not and has nothing to do with abridgment.
        The courts have also made it clear that the separation is on the school not individual students
        Third the separation refers to not promoting one religion not denying all religion. If the school had allowed him to sing and forbidden a kid to sing a Jewish or Muslim song then yeah their is a case but here they are clearly overprotective .

        By the way lest one accuse me of being a bible thumper I am as liberal as they come but I know the rules

    2. notlovinLA says:

      The entire country, particularly this principal, needs to go back and read that part about separation of STATE from CHURCH and get educated. It wasn’t written to keep church out of state, folks. It was written to keep the state out of religion and the right to practice as people wanted. So, actually, this principal has violated this boy’s rights.

  4. Ken says:

    How about MORE ABORTION, GANG, SEX, DRUG USE? Would that be more ACCEPTABLE?

    1. david says:

      Oh, Ken, grow up. If we oppose being sanctimoniously regaled with Christian propaganda, we’re pro gang?

      You can’t be serious.

      1. Yep says:

        Such a good liberal.

    2. bdj says:


      Stay on topic. Your response does not address anything in the news article.

  5. SHAWN says:


    1. herzco says:

      Shawn: Perhaps your comment would be taken more seriously if you did not write in ALL CAPS and did not have A total of four spelling and grammatical errors – in two sentences.

      1. shawn says:

        wow herzco thats all you got? im hurt maybe i should be able to sue because i dont like your stupid comment…..lol

      2. Yep says:

        liberals try to prove their futility by being online spell checkers. Friggin idiots.

    2. Burt says:

      Well, actually there were other students who were told that they couldn’t use their songs because of profanity. Let’s be fair. That was in the article.

  6. Marcus Jones says:

    School should win. If they want to sing about Jesus, sing it in Church or a religious event

    1. Ashley Yeager says:

      LOL, Silly Marcus & co. If it’s only proper to discuss religion in church, then where, oh where can you talk about Atheism?

  7. Mike says:

    Does this principal wear jack boots and peaked hat? Lets just erase the constitution and the bill of rights, they probably don’t teach them at that place anyway.

  8. Fred9952 says:

    We always talk about tolerance and understanding others. But that does not seem to apply to anything that is associated with Jesus or Christianity. I say let the boy do the performance and let the judges and audience decide if he merits a nod.

    1. allofyoustopwhining says:

      agreed. the kid isnt doing an altar call, reading from scripture, or asking them to convert. heck, hes not even asking them to sing. stop being whiners and let the kid do his song. toleration, anyone?

      1. notlovinLA says:

        Double agree. When did it become okay to remove the rights of Christians to please non-believers? Those who don’t want to hear the song can simply walk out. Problem solved.

  9. Albert says:

    There is the freedom of speech. There is a clause in the law regarding “there shall be no established church by the state.” This means that singing a song is not establing a religion. That is case law and not establishing a state religion but free exercise of speech.

  10. Marcus says:

    What’s a Jesus?

  11. Heather says:

    I myself am not Christian and would rather not have to listen to a song about Jesus it but this isn’t about the school, it’s about the student. It’s freedom of speech the school is taking from this student. If the school assigned the song it would be a different story but students have a right to their own opinions, they don’t leave them at the door when they go to school.

    1. herzco says:

      What if the student’s opinion was offensive to you somehow? What if, for example, he or she felt that the Holocaust didn’t happen?

  12. kirb says:

    why do I think, that if this was a muslim child singing a song about Mohamed, the same ones saying oh no dont sing about God or Jesus, would be bending over backwards to let the kid sing about mohamed?

    1. herzco says:

      Why Kirb? Because you seem totally DELUSIONAL. You are completely wrong – This would not happen in the LAUSD.

  13. ryan says:

    Maybe its a song about his Mexican friend Jesus>

    1. lot_at_this_guy's_post ^^^ says:

      this may be the best comment here, my friend.

  14. rakko says:

    I have written a song for the school that lauds The Prophet Mohammad 19 times in 25 lines. Is that okay?

  15. Roy Wilhelm says:

    According to the pamphlet “Free to Speak,” an excerpt from from the guidelines by the U.S. Department of Education: “Where student speakers are selected on the basis of genuinely neutral, evenhanded criteria and retain primary control of their expression, that expression is not attributable to the school and therefore may not be restricted because of its religious (or anti-religious) content.”

  16. Brate says:

    Keep religion out of public schools! We have enough religous strife without kids trying to stuff it down each others intellect! Seems to me there are a 1000 other songs he could choose to play wthout making a big “jesus” thing out of it.

  17. Jesus lives in TJ says:

    Amen Jesus!

  18. Rosanne Rodriguez says:

    He wants to DANCE to it, it’s an expression of his creativity. The federal government has more important issues to deal with than a public school talent show. This reminds me of why I support Homeschooling.

  19. Michael C. Teniente says:

    Amendment 1 – Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    As anyone can see the Constitution says that congress can not make a “religion” the establishment of the government. In other words: Congress, not some kid singing a song, is prohibited from making laws that would mandate a state religion. Some kid singing a song has no bearing on establishing a law whatsoever.

    So, unless congress is making people respect an establishment of religion…almost anything else goes.

    mike t.

    1. herzco says:

      Very good Michael! What have we learned from your post? That you can CUT AND PASTE paragraphs from the Constitution – paragraphs that fit what you desire. Never mind that you don’t know the law, or have NO idea about context etc. So silly. Do people really think they understand the TOTALITY of a problem by looking up something on Wikipedia etc, and then giving their not-too-bright opinions as “fact”?

      1. Michael C. Teniente says:


        At least I put the Constitution up as the bases of my thought. You just give a rebuttal based on what? The vanity of your mind? In a court of law…your thought process would be throw out as frivolous.

        mike t.

  20. Michael C. Teniente says:

    One more thing:

    This part of the Amendment:

    and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances

    That means the kid can sue if anyone prohibits his rights to free speech. Again, he sang a song (Freedom of speech) and in no way was influencing Congress to pass a law that would constitute the Establishment of Religion.

    mike t.

  21. Bible Believing Billy says:

    This sounds like a hate crime against people who believe in the Bible. As such, the offenders should be punished to the full extent of current hate crime trends. If a Muslim child was doing a dance to some eastern song about allah or ‘the sun and moon god’ – this would be considered quaint by all, and any objections, as such, would be construed as a hate crime. Turn about is fair play in today’s godless society! Romans 1:19; John 3:16

    1. herzco says:

      So much for Christian acceptance of other people’s faiths or of others desire NOT to have a faith. What a hypocrite you are (feel free to look up “hypocrite” in the dictionary)

      1. shawn says:

        billy isnt saying hes not accepting , he is just pointing out a fact that its ok to be of any faith and its accepted except for being christian.. whos the hypocrite now? look in the mirror.

    2. Bible Believing Billy says:

      thank you, shawn. being a christian has lost its role as the kernel for american values. But of course, where is America in the Bible? Isaiah 5, or course. Keep in mind Luke 21:16-17 As it is written, it will happen: “Even those closest to you–your parents, brothers, relatives, and friends–will betray you. And some of you will be killed. And everyone will hate you because of your allegiance to me.” — Jesus

      1. Sunnydays says:

        Amen! I will be praying for all these lost souls on here.

  22. Michiko Ota Eyre says:

    One can make the argument that public funds are being used to support the talent show, therefore proselytizing, regardless of who is performing it, can be seen as a misuse of property tax money and federal funding. Whether it is Christianity or not is irrelevant. We must keep our public schools and government overall, secular.

  23. Melissa Edwards says:

    i think the talent show should get rid of singing all together. If christian songs are not to be allowed then neither should the secular. Even if the song isn’t suggestive the christian students may find it just as offensive as their songs are not about God and are generally about self gratification and not about Gods opinion on the matter. Any songs that will be danced to should be purely instrumental since the matter is about offense. Just like in american idol its not about the song choice its about the talent of what is done with the song, phrasing, tone, melody, arrangement. There are christians out there who need to be heard whether people like it or not, even if you don’t agree with the kid why stifle what he wants to say to you? if he wanted to show his business skills, or show he could work a guitar like jimi hendrix we would praise him and put him on kids got talent. people talk so much about tolerance except for when it comes to christians. you want people to be openminded about everything and anything but God i think its time we shut up and let the kind be a the light he wants to be. Why stop a kid who wants to spread a message of love, forgiveness, repentance, giving, self-control, faithfulness, grace, mercy, kindness? i wonder if you stifle his gift, who does that make you?

  24. Michael C. Teniente says:

    Sorry Michiko,

    But unless there is LAW being introduced by CONGRESS to the ESTABLISHMENT of a RELIGION as the STATE OR GOVERNMENT RELIGION no law has be broken here. Or no violation of the 1st Amendment is in play here.

    mike t.

    1. bdj says:

      I will go back to the very first statement I made, “Religious songs of any kind have a proper place, but not in public schools”. It’s not about freedom of speech. It’s, in my opinion, what is appropriate for the environment.

      1. Michael C. Teniente says:

        But your “opinion” doesn’t implement the actual interpretation of the 1st Amendment. “…What is appropriate for the environment.”…has nothing to do with Congress introducing a law that defies the wording of the 1st Amendment.

        That is what separates opinion from law. Adherence to the words of the Constitution and not the words of your thoughts. In other words: allow the words of the Constitution to enter into your mind and then lets see if how you interpret what is being said fits what is actually written. “What is appropriate for environment.” That is your thoughts. But did you apply “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” to your thought process to come to the conclusion that “What is appropriate for environment.” as a legitimate argument for keeping a kid from singing a religious song in a public school?

        If you examine the 1st Amendment compared to your statement…you have no legal standing to enforce your point of view.

        mike t.

      2. socalmal says:

        “appropriate for the environment”? You mean the one where your school nurse has to allow you access to abortions without parental consent? The one where sex, drugs, humanistic altruism, and lack of respect rules supreme? Yeah, I can see how a kid doing an interpretive Jesus dance wouldn’t be welcomed. No tolerance for Christians.

      3. bdj says:

        Your are right, it’s an opinion, it’s not a legal standing. I am not a constitutional lawyer. I will not argue constitution law. I will stand by my comment that there is a proper place and time for everything. Religious songs belong in a religious school. I do not care which religion you choose, my view applies to all religions. You would not have stripper in an school talent show, it’s not appropriate for the environment. My point being, some thing relate to the written law, some thing relate to commen sense law.

  25. Brad Norwood says:

    If this little diddy violates the constitutionally mandated separation of church from state, then the hundreds of millions of dollars deducted on state and federal tax returns is also illegal.
    Those deductions for religious contributions result in hundreds of millions of dollars in tax that does not have to be paid.
    Thus, the state and Fed are subsidizing churches via the tax code….very very illetgal!!

  26. Michael C. Teniente says:

    The problem here is that people keep misquoting the 1st Amendment in regards to the place of religion in our society. If I sang a Christian song in government building…that still doesn’t have a bearing on congress introducing a law that would establish my religion as the state religion.

    Read it and weep!

    mike t.

  27. Gabriel Hill says:

    If he wanted to sing about being a gay islamic boy they would have said nothing. Tolerance should be taught in schools just like math and reading.

      1. Gabriel Hill says:

        Ignorant comment. I support tolerance. They could have shown tolerance.

    1. Rasheed Al Cinder says:

      Why u be hatin on gays and muslims?

      1. Sunnydays says:

        It’s ok for Muslims to dress the way they dress, believe in what they believe, build their mosques all over America and we have no problem with it. But when a Christian wants to sing a song about Jesus, it’s not ok? I don’t get it?

  28. coup says:

    kewl, so this mean Mulsims can also sing about their prophet in public school……equal to all religion faith right?!

  29. mai says:


    The media got it wrong again!!!! It was NOT the Principal’s decision and it is not a school time activity!

    This Talent Show is an after-school activity organized by the PTA, and it was the Parent Committee of the Talent Show that asked the student to change the song. (He was always scheduled to perform!). The Principal was supporting the committee’s decision.


  30. Commando Carl says:

    You must be VC then. Charlie don’t surf.

    1. bdj says:

      Your comment is cruel, demining, and uncalled for.

  31. Everett says:

    Everett, What an idiot this principal is, if it was my kid she would regret it, this kid is emotionaly hurt.
    she is jewish i can tell.

  32. Nena says:

    This is what I mean….all the nutso come out with news like this!!!

    Hey where were all of you, especially the media when this school received the National Blue Ribbon award this school year?!?! The media was invited when they had a Celebration Ceremony at the school….NOT ONE OF YOU SHOWED UP! We even invited the Superintendent, the Mayor of L.A., the Govenor……..NO ONE CAME!!!

    But if it’s something negative to report about any public school…..the Media come out in the boat loads!!!! UNBELIEVEABLE!!!

    That’s what we teach our children…….emphasize on the negative issues at schools not positive recognitions!!!! That’s what are America is all about!!!!!

  33. Michael C. Teniente says:

    To the people who quote “Church and State.” Read this:

    “The concept of separation of church and state refers to the distance in the relationship between organized religion and the nation state. The term is an offshoot of the phrase, “wall of separation between church and state,” as written in Thomas Jefferson’s letter to the Danbury Baptists Association in 1802. The original text reads: “…I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.”[1] The phrase was quoted by the United States Supreme Court first in 1878, and then in a series of cases starting in 1947. Like many long-established constitutional principles such as freedom of speech and freedom of assembly, the phrase “separation of church and state” itself does not appear verbatim in the U.S. Constitution. The First Amendment to the Constitution states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.””

    Again, arguments should be made with the actual 1st Amendment and not the “Church and State” phrase.

    CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW! A kid singing a song is not the enactment of a law by congress so the kid’s rights to free speech have been violated.

    mike t.

  34. Ed Rooney says:

    What this kid needs is a good molestin’ ya’ll- yee haw!

  35. Bible Believing Billy says:

    The child WILL be aloud to perform. Thank you, Jesus.

    1. MeSpelGud says:

      The word you’re looking for is “allowed”, you cretin.

    2. Bible Believing Billy says:

      Pun intended. I hope he is very LOUD in his interpretation of the song.

  36. Bible Believing Billy says:

    If the Lord is willing, it would would be wonderful to see a video of the performance, if one should become available – of course. 😉

  37. Parent who does not use child as pawn says:

    How sad that these parents felt the right “Christian” thing to do was to sue a bankrupt school district. There is no funding left for arts programs. Some volunteers tried to let the students showcase their talent and this is thanks they get. I think it could have been handled differently by the parents. Does this mean my child could do an interpretive devil worship dance? Sing old slave hymns? Recite from L. Ron Hubbard? Fair is fair. Where does it end? How about some common sense? It is a public elementary school.

    1. SAC says:

      To Parent who does not use child as pawn:

      The parents did not sue. The ADF sued on their behalf; And they were not seeking damages. They were suing to have the school allow their son to be able to exercise his constitutional rights. The case was settled when the school board did the right thing. No money was wasted here.

      1. #1aunt says:

        SAC Thank you. Some people just dont get it and unfortunatly never will. This is a talent show not a “holiday” program. He was in tears when he heard that his song would offend people.. for heavens sake he is 10. I am proud that I will be in that audience to see him dance his little butt off.

    2. dontpushmybutton says:

      Yes it is a public School, it is also paid for by our tax dollars, we all have the same 1st amendment right, so what the heck do you mean where does it end? that school belongs to the People just as our government is we the people, too bad the Unions don’t get out of the way and let the people run the education system, because frankly the job they are doing might be great in Cuba..but here in the USA we’d prefer to keep our freedoms and raise the bar on education.

  38. Jennifer Jacobson says:

    What a sad state of affairs when a child cannot be proud of his/her religion and where a principal cannot distinguish between personal choice and school policy. But religious intolerance at Superior Elementary comes as no surprise to me. When my daughters attended the school, it was typical at the holidays for the kids to decorate the auditorium with paper Christmas trees and candycanes, Santa and angels. But when my Jewish daughters questioned why they couldn’t cut out, decorate and hang menorah or Jewish stars, they were told that those were religious symbols and Santa Claus was secular!

  39. Cindy Hudson says:

    Just substitute Allah where the lyrics say Jesus and see how long it takes to run that little kid and his family right out of town. There ‘s a First Amendment test for you!

  40. jojo says:

    Why would anyone want to do that anyway? It must mean they don’t care about offending others that happen to believe differently. Too bad.

  41. Michael C. Teniente says:

    As a Christian I have one more thing to say:

    American Christians wouldn’t be getting attacked so much if they would only STOP defending the faith and actually start practicing the faith. Remember God is no fool and judgement starts in the house of God.

    I Peter 4:17

    “For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?”

    mike t.

  42. Michael C. Teniente says:

    Before “they get it!” You, as a fake Christian, are going to “get it first!”

    And that is gospel. If, as Christians proclaim and I believe, this nation is based on Christian principles then the deterioration of the nation is on the Christian people because they don’t practice what they preach. Christian hypocrisy is what is bringing this nation down. That’s what “…judgment must begin at the house of God:…” means. The house of God (This nation) is being judged and it starts with Christian hypocrisy.

    mike t.

  43. Tyrone says:

    I applaude this boy and his parents “Good Parents” what is wrong with a little religion, and keep that damn rapp music out of the school system which is more offensive than telling someone Jesus is coming and I hope when Jesus comes he will stick a big ass microphone up the rapper’s ass

  44. SAC says:

    Brad, you’re wrong. If the government were subsidizing one religion over another, you’d have a point. But since the government does not favor one over another, there is nothing illegal about it. In fact, giving the tax breaks to all religions actually puts them on a more equal footing- A very small church, mosque, etc. would not have the funds of, say, the Catholic Church, to be able to afford the taxes.

    It’s a shame you don’t understand the full purpose of this portion of the constitution. Giving the tax breaks fosters ALL religions, making the size of the purse strings less relevant.

  45. watsup3 says:

    Seems like a lot of us need to go back to school – quoting constitutional stuff that we don’t fully understand. A few have it right, separation of Church and State isn’t meant to exclude religion as an individual choice. It’s meant to prevent the State from unfairly imparting a particular religious view on ANYONE. In this case, the State has nothing to do with it. This is an individuals choice and well within his 1st amendment rights. The school is in error.

  46. Mai says:

    What should be a fun after-school activity, organized by parent volunteers has become a spectical of negative words from both the media and the public.
    Where were all of you when this school received the National Blue Ribbon School Award (the media was invited), the California Distinguished School Award?

    Take note: It was NOT the LAUSD or school Principal who asked the student to change his song, it was the Volunteer Parent Committee of the Talent Show.

    Thank you & May Our Heavenly Father Watch Over Superior Street School!

    1. #1aunt says:

      Actually you are incorrect the Principal called and told the mother that the song was offensive because the word Jesus was said in the chorus. This is about his right to sing what he wants and if you had seen the tears when he was told he couldnt perform the song you would have responded the same way.

  47. Tom says:

    I am a Catholic Christian. I think it is a shame especially for all the Christians out there that you don’t have more respect for each other. Respect is a great part of Christs message and a large part of LOVE. Why can’t we just discuss these things without all the insults. We all have a right to our opinions. I believe wee should try and be more humble and not call each other names or insult each other. I understand if those persons who don’t believe in Christ do so. But those of us who believe should try and show more respect to others even if they don’t show respect to us. Isn’t that the message of Christ???

  48. Dontpushmybutton says:

    How truely sad that so many haven’t a clue as to the phrase “separation of Church and State” came from..In a letter written in 1802 Thomas Jefferson addressed the Danbury Baptists over a misunderstanding..In that letter which contained the phase “Wall of Separation” Thomas Jefferson explained that no congress or executive was to do anything that might be misconstrued as the establishment of Religion. meaning The State (or Country) could not establish its own religion. It had nothing to do with “separation of church and State’ which is now being used as a tool to dismantle the chuch. The Bible was a standard book in all classrooms until the progressive movement began its attack on people of the Christian faith. As with most of the progressive movement it has been the catalyst used for the communism we now see being pushed on our children through the indoctrination process of both the educational system and childrens television programming…basically they have covered the ground…24/7!

  49. Annie says:

    You know, It really cracks me up to see people on here shutting down things like this, I sit here and I read the comments of those who deny the existence of God. No one is pushing you to believe anything that the song has to say about Jesus. The child obviously likes the song and wanted to share it with his fellow students, I see nothing wrong here. He is not standing on stage pointing a gun saying, “you all better believe in God”. So why don’t you just zip your lips and let the child express the way he feels. We all have rights and once you discriminate against our beliefs, race, or anything else you should know that we will do anything in our power to make things right. Word to the wise, In the bible it says, if you deny the father as your savior when judgment comes and you are before the father, the father will say apart from me; for I do not know you. Just saying.

  50. suzzanne says:

    the child wants to sing a song, not trying to convert. if that offends you how ever do you drive past churches with crosses on them. get over it .

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Watch & Listen LIVE